Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This dissertation seeks to explore how entrepreneurs engage in prospective sensemaking and what role their arational beliefs play in it. I investigate the implications of prospective sensemaking on opportunity identification and risk management. While the current literature on entrepreneurship focuses on strategic approaches to understanding entrepreneurial behavior, I loosen the focus on strategy and also give attention to the role of spirituality, enchantment and magic that exist as an organizational phenomenon in counterpoint to the often over articulated economically rational views within modern organizations. I draw on the concept of magical realism as part of the research study and suggest that a magical realist perception of reality or magical realist cognitive orientation exists among entrepreneurs. I am looking into experiences of arational phenomena by entrepreneurs or their arational beliefs, and the way the arational and rational aspects of life are reconciled in the building and enacting of successful futures. My focal research question asks: how do entrepreneurs use a magical realist perception in future oriented sensemaking? And more specifically, in Study 1, how do different temporal orientations in sensemaking affect entrepreneurs’ perception of risk and uncertainty? And in Study 2, how does future-oriented sensemaking draw upon spirituality to mitigate risk, reduce uncertainty and inspire the confidence of external stakeholders in the absence of a rational historical context? In an attempt to answer these question I conduct a thematic analysis of 30 business biographies (Study 1) and of 40 semi-structured interviews collected from entrepreneurs located mainly in Edmonton, Alberta (Study 2). The findings reveal that entrepreneurs use their magical realist perception to project successful futures for their companies. A magical realist perception helps them to deal with risk and uncertainty within the volatile world of start-up business. They are able to find inner peace, construct safe future, and most importantly, keep on going despite difficulties and setbacks. This research makes three significant contributions to organizational theory. First, it shows that in the absence of past successes and proved organizational practices, entrepreneurs can use a magical realist perception and draw on arational beliefs and experiences to construct a triumphant future. Second, a magical realist perception helps entrepreneurs to cope with anxiety and insecurity associated with risk and uncertainty. Third, entrepreneurs with a magical realist perception create such perception through deep integration of their spirituality and religious belief into their work life. Thus, the rational and arational spheres of life become indistinguishable for them.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».