Pre-Clinical and Clinical Immunomodulatory Effects of Pomalidomide or CC-92480 in Combination with Bortezomib in Multiple Myeloma
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Pomalidomide (POM) is an established agent in relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM) with direct cytotoxicity against MM cells and immunostimulatory activities in multiple cell types including T cells and NK cells. CC-92480 is a novel Aiolos/Ikaros degrading cereblon E3 ligase modulator (CELMoD ®) agent is currently being investigated in combination with the proteasome inhibitor (PI) bortezomib (BTZ) and corticosteroid dexamethasone (DEX), or with DEX only in R/R MM (CC-92480-MM-002 and CC-92480-MM-001). Previous results indicate that triplet combination of POM/BTZ/DEX may enhance some T, B and NK cell subpopulations, overcoming immunosuppression when compared to BTZ/DEX-only treated patients (Rao et al, 2019). Mechanisms of action (MOA) of CC-92480- and POM-mediated substrate depletion occurs via ubiquitination and proteasome degradation, where BTZ has been speculated as potentially antagonistic as a PI. Here, we report pre-clinical and clinical observations of an immune MOA of CC-92480 or POM in combination with BTZ. Results: To mimic the clinical pharmacokinetics, BTZ was utilized as a high-dose pulse method alone and in combination with POM or CC-92480, followed by flow cytometric measurements of Aiolos and Ikaros protein abundance in healthy donor (HD) T cells. The addition of BTZ modestly delayed CRBN-dependent substrate depletion compared to single agent POM or CC-92480; however, this effect was only apparent at early time points (1-6 hr) where the effect was negligible by 24 hr. To understand the functional implications of BTZ combination, we conducted CD3-stimulated PBMC-mediated cytotoxicity assay against H929 MM target cells in a co-culture model. The efficiency of POM or CC-92480 induced PBMC-mediated killing in a dose dependent manner (~65% increase compared to DMSO) were similar at a 100-fold lower dose range of CC-92480 compared to POM, with the effect not being altered by co-treatment with BTZ. These data were replicated with a POM or CC-92480 treated supernatant stimulation of purified NK cells co-culture, which induced an 80% reduction in target cell viability with the BTZ combination having no negative effects on CELMoD-mediated activity. Cytokine analysis on PBMC supernatants treated with either POM or CC-92480 in the absence or presence of BTZ-pulse showed a dose-dependent increase in IL-2 (>2.4-fold) and Granzyme B (>3.1-fold), which were not impacted by BTZ co-treatment. As a secondary readout on activation status, we measured multiple signaling molecules and activation markers on the cell surface of T and NK cell subsets in CD3 stimulated HD PBMCs treated with dose-dependent POM or CC-92480 with or without co-treatment of BTZ. Compared to DMSO controls, elevated expression levels of CD25 (IL2RA), CD278 (ICOS), Granzyme B, CD134 (OX40R) and HLA-DR were observed with both POM and CC-92480 on CD4, CD8 and NK cells demonstrating a CELMoD-mediated increase in immune activation. These effects were not impacted by the co-treatment of BTZ. Examination of peripheral blood samples from MM patients enrolled in the CC-92480-MM-001/002 (NCT03374085/NCT03989414) clinical trials revealed that CC-92480 promoted potent immunomodulation when administered in combination with DEX and with BTZ/DEX. These data included increased numbers of activated and central memory T cells, as well as increased Ki67+ proliferating T and NK cell populations compared to samples collected during the screening period before any drugs had been administered, consistent with earlier observation of POM in combination with BTZ/DEX treated patients. Conclusions: Taken together, these data demonstrate that POM and CC-92480 are potent immunomodulatory agents with enhanced induction of PBMC and NK mediated cell killing of MM tumor cells and activation of T and NK cells, at 100-fold lower concentrations of CC-92480 compared to POM. Additionally, we showed that combination with BTZ in preclinical assays and in the clinical setting did not antagonistically affect the immunostimulatory ability of POM or CC-92480. Disclosures Bjorklund: BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Amatangelo: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Chiu: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Kang: BMS: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Civardi: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Katz: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Maciag: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Hagner: BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Pourdehnad: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Patents & Royalties: No royalty. Bahlis: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria. Richardson: Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Protocol Intelligence: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Secura Bio: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Thakurta: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Patents & Royalties.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».