MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3214073113 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-147293

OMNIVERSE: A Phase 1b/2 Study of Oral Azacitidine Plus Venetoclax in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) or Newly Diagnosed (ND) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

2021· article· en· W3214073113 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Farhad Ravandi, Hetty E. Carraway, Lilia Taningco, Kimberley Dilley, Eric Laille, Jing Gong, Daniel L. Menezes, Andrew H. Wei

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésVenetoclaxAzacitidineMedicineRefractory (planetary science)Myeloid leukemiaInternal medicineLeukemiaOncologyMyeloidPhases of clinical researchGastroenterologyClinical trialBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Novel AML treatments (Tx) have improved the tolerability and clinical outcomes for older patients (pts) with AML, especially since standard intensive chemotherapy (IC) regimens are associated with risks of toxicity and mortality. Lower-intensity Tx options for IC-ineligible pts include low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) or hypomethylating agents (HMAs; azacitidine [AZA] and decitabine), which are generally well tolerated, but have been associated with inferior outcomes vs IC [Vey 2020]. As such, the development of less-toxic regimens with better efficacy has been a priority, and increased focus has been given to optimizing Tx regimens in the outpatient setting for convenience, independence, and quality of life (QoL). The oral formulation of AZA (Oral-AZA [CC-486]) is approved in the United States, European Union, and Canada for Tx of pts with ND AML in first remission after IC who are not able to complete curative therapy (eg, HSCT). In a pivotal phase 3 trial, Oral-AZA 300 mg QD for 14 days (d)/28d Tx cycle was well tolerated and improved overall survival (OS) vs placebo in pts with AML in CR/CRi after IC. Oral-AZA has also shown preliminary clinical efficacy in pts with active AML [Savona 2015]. Novel regimens based on LDAC or HMAs in combination with newer agents, including the BCL2 inhibitor, venetoclax (VEN), have demonstrated promising activity in older pts with AML. Although only modest clinical benefits were achieved with single-agent VEN in pts with R/R AML [Konopleva 2016], the combination of VEN + AZA in pts with ND AML shows synergistic anti-leukemic activity via AZA-mediated inhibition of MCL1 and BCL-XL, enhancing BCL2 dependence in leukemic cells. In IC-ineligible ND AML, VEN + injectable AZA significantly improved remission rates and OS vs AZA alone [DiNardo 2020]. Consequently, VEN, in combination with an HMA or LDAC, was approved in the US for Tx of pts with ND AML aged ≥ 75 years (y) or those with comorbidities precluding use of IC. Given S-phase-restricted DNA incorporation of AZA, extended Oral-AZA dosing regimens (> 7d/28d Tx cycle) increases the opportunity for cycling cells to incorporate the drug, thereby sustaining epigenetic activity [Laille 2015]. An outpatient VEN + AZA oral combination regimen may also increase the likelihood of pt adherence [Eek 2016]. Here, we describe the study design and objectives of the OMNIVERSE trial of Oral-AZA + VEN in older pts with ND AML or pts with AML R/R to prior Tx. Study Design and Methods: OMNIVERSE (NCT04887857) is a multicenter, open-label, phase 1b/2 trial conducted in 3 sequential study parts (Figure). Key objectives of the 2-part, dose-finding phase 1b portion are to evaluate safety and establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of Oral-AZA + VEN, first in pts with R/R AML (World Health Organization [WHO] 2016 criteria) ineligible to receive further IC (part 1), and subsequently in pts with ND AML (WHO 2016) aged ≥ 75 y, or those aged ≥ 18-74 y with comorbidities that preclude use of IC or HSCT (part 2). Key pt eligibility criteria include an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2 (ECOG 3 is allowed for pts aged ≥ 18-74 y with comorbidities), and an unfavorable cytogenetic risk profile for pts with ND AML. The starting dose of Oral-AZA is 300 mg QD × 14d cycle, which can be escalated to 300 mg × 21d or de-escalated to 200 mg × 14d/28d cycle depending on dose-limiting toxicities experienced; oral VEN is taken QD continuously (or 21d/cycle for dose level -2). A modified toxicity probability interval-2 (mTPI-2) design is used to evaluate the planned dose levels. The sample size of the phase 1b portion depends on the dose levels utilized (≤ 18 pts in each part). In phase 2, pts with ND AML (same inclusion criteria as for phase 1b-part 2) will receive Oral-AZA + VEN at the RP2D. The primary endpoint is the rate of complete remission (CR) plus CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh). Key secondary endpoints include safety, duration of CR/CRh, overall response rate (per European Leukemia Net criteria), and longitudinal minimal residual disease (MRD) profiling for CR/CRh responders. Key exploratory objectives are to characterize DNA methylation patterns and BCL2 family member expression profiles. The phase 2 expansion will enroll ~100 pts, which is calculated based on the response rates from the M14-358 (NCT02203773) and VIALE-A (NCT02993523) studies. Enrollment is planned to begin in 2021. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ravandi: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Prelude: Research Funding; Syros Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Taiho: Honoraria, Research Funding; Xencor: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astex: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Carraway: Takeda: Other: Independent review committee; Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb company: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astex: Other: Independent review committee; Stemline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Other: Independent review committee; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Taningco: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Dilley: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Abbvie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months. Laille: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Gong: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Lopes de Menezes: Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Patents & Royalties. Wei: Abbvie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Celgene/BMS, Genentech, Janssen, MacroGenics, Novartis, Pfizer, and Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis, Abbvie, Celgene/BMS: Speakers Bureau; Former employee of Walter and Eliza Hall Institute: Patents & Royalties: Prof. Andrew Wei is a former employee of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute and is eligible for a fraction of the royalty stream related to Venetoclax; Abbvie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Celgene/BMS, Genentech, Janssen, MacroGenics, Novartis, Pfizer, and Servier: Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy; Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene/BMS, Novartis, Servier and F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,019

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,291
Écart entre enseignants0,272 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→Travaux en français237 207→