MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3214477505 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-152225

TAK-981, a First-in-Class SUMO-Activating Enzyme Inhibitor, Combined with Rituximab in Adult Patients (Pts) with CD20-Positive Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL): Phase 1 Data

2021· article· en· W3214477505 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Sarit Assouline, Amitkumar Mehta, Tycel Phillips, Lapo Alinari, Alexey V. Danilov, Stéphane Doucet, Steven I. Park, Deborah Berg, Alejandro Gómez-Pinillos, Alonzo Martinez, Bo H. Chao, Allison Berger, John F. Gibbs, Sharon Friedlander, Christine K. Ward, Igor Proscurshim, Brenda Cooper, Paolo F. Caimi

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Établissements canadiensCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalJewish General Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRituximabCD20Refractory (planetary science)LymphomaMedicineHodgkin lymphomaInternal medicineCancer researchOncologyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: TAK-981 is the first small-molecule inhibitor of SUMOylation to enter clinical trials. SUMOylation is a post-translational modification in which small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) proteins are activated and covalently attached to substrate proteins. SUMOylation has a central role in constraining type I interferon (IFN-I)-dependent responses (Decque Nat Immunol 2016). By blocking SUMOylation, TAK-981 promotes IFN-I production and increases innate immunity. The ability of TAK-981 to promote activation of macrophages and NK cells and increase their cytotoxic/phagocytic activity provides a mechanistic rationale for its use in combination with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) reliant on antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and phagocytosis. Preclinical studies have demonstrated synergistic antitumor activity between TAK-981 and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab in xenograft models of human B cell lymphoma (Nakamura AACR 2019). Based on these data, and a single-agent TAK-981 study (TAK-981-1002), this phase 1b/2, open-label, dose-escalation and expansion study is investigating the safety and efficacy of TAK-981 plus rituximab in adults with CD20-positive R/R NHL (NCT04074330); here, we report data from the phase 1b dose-escalation part of the study. Methods: Eligible pts were aged ≥18 years with CD20-positive, R/R aggressive B-cell NHL (aNHL) or indolent NHL (iNHL). aNHL included diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and grade 3b follicular lymphoma (FL); iNHL included grade 1-3a FL and marginal zone lymphoma. aNHL pts had to have received prior R-CHOP or equivalent plus 1 additional line of therapy in the R/R setting; iNHL pts had to be refractory to rituximab or another anti-CD20 mAb, and to have received at least 1 prior therapy for R/R disease. TAK-981 IV was given at increasing doses (starting: 10 mg) on days 1 and 8 (QW) or days 1, 4, 8, and 11 (BIW) of 21-day cycles. Rituximab 375 mg/m 2 IV was given on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1 and on day 1 thereafter. Dose escalation was based on adaptive Bayesian logistic regression modelling with overdose control based on the posterior probability of having a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Primary phase 1b objectives were safety, tolerability, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of TAK-981 in combination with rituximab; data cutoff was 28 June 2021. Results: 24 pts have been enrolled and treated: 19 QW (10-120 mg) and 5 BIW (90 mg); 4 are currently on treatment. Enrollment continues in the 90 mg BIW and 120 mg QW cohorts. Median age was 65 years (range 29-80); 67% were male. No DLTs have been reported to date. RP2D and schedule will be determined based on safety, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) data. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are shown in the Table. Most common TEAEs (≥15%) were similar between the QW/BIW schedules with the exception of dizziness (2 pts at 10 mg, 2 at 40 mg, and 1 at 90 mg) and hypokalemia (1 pt at 40 mg, 2 at 90 mg, and 1 at 120 mg); all QW. TEAEs were consistent with induction of IFN signalling (transient flu-like symptoms: fever, chills, fatigue) and with those observed in the single-agent study (data on file); no further TAK-981- or immune-related TEAEs were observed. Grade ≥3 TEAEs related to TAK-981 were reported in 2 pts: grade 3 atrial fibrillation (ongoing cardiac history) and grade 4 neutropenia; both in the 40 mg QW cohort and transient. In this population of rituximab-refractory pts, there were 5 objective responses in 17 response-evaluable pts: 4 partial responses (2 at 10 mg, FL and DLBCL; 1 at 60 mg, DLBCL; 1 at 90 mg, primary mediastinal thymic large B-cell lymphoma) and 1 complete response (40 mg, MCL), all in the QW cohort. TAK-981 PK was linear and declined in a tri-phasic manner. TAK-981 exhibited PD activity in peripheral blood including target engagement, decreased SUMOylation, and increased IFN-regulated gene expression (Figure). Conclusion: The combination of TAK-981 and rituximab was well tolerated in pts across each dose level and schedule. TAK-981 PK showed minimal accumulation after repeat dosing and PD assays confirmed inhibition of SUMOylation and activation of IFN-I signalling. More importantly, the combination of TAK-981 and rituximab resulted in promising clinical activity (ORR 29%) in the R/R setting, supporting the continued development of this combination in pts with NHL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Assouline: Johnson&Johnson: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Research Funding; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec: Current Employment. Mehta: Affirmed; Kite/Gilead; Roche-Genetech; Celgene/BMS; Oncotartis; Innate Pharmaceuticals; Seattle Genetics; Incyte; Takeda; Fortyseven Inc/Gilead; TG Therapeutics; Merck; Juno Pharmaceuticals/Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics; Incyte; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics; Incyte; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy. Phillips: Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADCT, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, Incyte, Karyopharm, Morphosys, Pharmacyclics, Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Other: received travel expenses from Incyte, Research Funding. Danilov: Rigel Pharm: Honoraria; Bristol-Meyers-Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Beigene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SecuraBio: Research Funding; Bayer Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Doucet: Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Jannsen: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy. Park: Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; G1 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding; Rafael Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Advisory Board; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Berg: Takeda: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Gomez-Pinillos: Takeda: Current Employment. Martinez: Takeda: Current Employment. Chao: Takeda: Current Employment. Berger: Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc.: Current Employment. Gibbs: Takeda: Current Employment. Friedlander: Takeda: Current Employment. Ward: Takeda: Current Employment. Proscurshim: Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Caimi: TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; XaTek Inc.: Patents & Royalties; Celgene: Speakers Bureau.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,010

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,232
Écart entre enseignants0,222 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations10
Publié2021
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysTravaux en français237 207