Development of Fault Current Controller Technology
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Fault current controller (FCC) technology, also frequently referred to as fault current limiter (FCL) technology,has been identified as a potentially viable solution for expanding the capacity of the transmission system and its service life to meet the growing demand for electricity, by addressing the impacts of the resulting higher fault currents. This document reports on the program supported by the California Institute for Energy and Environment under the California Energy Commission in the development of distribution class FCC technology. The project focused on test plan development, prototyping, laboratory test, and field demonstration, with a view toward potential further technical development and application of the technology in transmission-level systems. The University of California Irvineled the project with overall responsibility for project management, administration, coordination, and technical guidance, with the support of the California Institute for Energy & Environment (CIEE) at the University of California, Berkeley. Southern California Edison Co. (SCE) was the host utility for the field demonstration, providing on-site engineering personnel, expertise and support. Zenergy Power and the EPRI/Silicon Power team were engaged to prototype a passive type FCC and an active FCC, respectively, for laboratory testing and field demonstration.\nA full-size three-phase distribution level high temperature superconductor (HTS) FCC prototype was designed, built, and field tested by Zenergy Power, plc. The prototype FCC went through several iterations of extensive testing at Powertech Labs Inc., Surrey, BC, Canada and at the High Voltage Laboratory of SCE’s Westminster facility prior to field installation. It was then installed at SCE’s Avanti “Circuit of the Future” for field demonstration from March 2009 through October 2010. \nThe EPRI/Silicon Power team has completed an initial design for asolid-state based FCC. Due to design changesthat were necessary to improve the thermal management of the prototype but were beyond the scope of this project, this design did not advance to the laboratory and field test stages during the project period.\nThis report provides a technology survey of FCC technology, including both the saturable core and solid-state types represented by this project, followed by detailed design considerations, laboratory test procedures and results, field test installation and metering, and field demonstration outcomes. The report concludes with a summary of the lessons learned and recommendations for future research efforts
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle