A Phase II Study of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin for the Treatment of Measurable Residual Disease-Positive B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Persistent or recurrent measurable residual disease (MRD) is associated with high rates of relapse and poor survival in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We aimed to evaluate the anti-CD22 antibody-drug conjugate, inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO), in patients (pts) with B-cell ALL in complete morphologic remission who did not achieve MRD negativity with conventional therapy or who experienced MRD recurrence. Methods: This is a single-arm, phase II trial of pts with B-cell ALL in complete remission (CR) who did not achieve MRD negativity or had MRD-positive relapse after at least 3 months from the start of frontline therapy (i.e. CR1) or 1 month from the start of any salvage therapy (i.e. CR2 and beyond). Positive MRD was defined as ≥0.01% by multiparameter flow cytometry in pts with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative ALL and a BCR-ABL1 to ABL1 transcript ratio by PCR of ≥0.01% for pts with Ph-positive ALL. MRD negativity was defined as undetectable MRD by flow and PCR at a sensitivity of at least 10 -4. INO was given at a dose of 0.6 mg/m 2 on day 1 and 0.3 mg/m 2 on day 8 of cycle 1 and 0.3 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8 of subsequent cycles (up to 6 total cycles, given every 21-28 days). Ursodiol prophylaxis was given to all pts. Subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was offered depending on donor availability and pt fitness. Pts with Ph+ ALL received concomitant therapy with a TKI. The choice of TKI was up to the treating physician. Results: Between 11/2018 and 5/2021, 16 pts with MRD-positive B-cell ALL in CR were enrolled. The median age was 47 years (range, 20-67 years). Ten pts (63%) had Ph-positive ALL; 9 pts received concomitant ponatinib, and 1 received dasatinib. Eleven pts (69%) were in CR1, and 5 pts (31%) were in CR2 and beyond (3 in CR2 and 2 in CR3). Ten pts (62.5%) had persistent MRD and 6 (37.5%) had MRD recurrence. Nine (56%) pts had received prior blinatumomab, 3 (19%) pts had undergone prior ASCT, and one (6%) patient had undergone CAR-T. Pts received a median of 3 cycles of INO consolidation (range, 1-6 cycles). Overall, 8 pts (50%) achieved MRD negativity at any time. Four of 6 pts (67%) with Ph-negative ALL achieved MRD negativity by flow cytometry, and 4 of 10 pts (40%) with Ph-positive ALL achieved MRD negativity by PCR. Four additional pts with Ph-positive ALL achieved a major molecular response (MMR) as best response. Among the 8 MRD responders, 7 pts (87.5%) responded after 1 cycle, and 1 (12.5%) responded after 2 cycles. Five of 7 pts (71%) with no prior blinatumomab exposure responded to INO whereas only 3 of 9 pts (33%) with prior blinatumomab responded. Five pts (63% of MRD responders) proceeded to ASCT (1 in CR1 and 4 in CR2+) with median time to ASCT of 4 months (range, 2-5 months). With a median follow-up of 14 months (range, 1-22 months), 1 pt relapsed (13% of MRD responders). The estimated 1-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were both 75% (Figure 1). The 1-year OS rates for responders and non-responders were 86% and 63%, respectively. One responding patient died (from post-ASCT complications), and 3 non-responding pts died (2 from disease progression and 1 from unknown causes). Among the 3 responders who did not undergo ASCT, 1 subsequently relapsed, and all are still alive. Among the 5 responders who underwent ASCT, no pts have subsequently relapsed; 1 pt died from post-ASCT complications, and the 1-year OS rate of transplanted pts was 75%. INO-related adverse events were as expected. The only grade 4 events were hematologic; 6 pts (38%) developed grade 4 neutropenia and 2 pts (13%) developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 events included: 4 pts (25%) with thrombocytopenia, 1 pt (6%) with anemia, and 2 pts with transaminase elevation. One patient discontinued study treatment due grade 3 veno-occlusive disease after 5 courses of INO. Conclusion: INO is a well-tolerated and effective agent to eradicate MRD in pts with B-cell ALL who have persistent MRD or who experience MRD recurrence. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Short: Novartis: Honoraria; NGMBio: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Astellas: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kantarjian: Aptitude Health: Honoraria; NOVA Research: Honoraria; Ipsen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; KAHR Medical Ltd: Honoraria; Astellas Health: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Immunogen: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Honoraria; Taiho Pharmaceutical Canada: Honoraria. Alvarado: MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; CytomX Therapeutics: Consultancy; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; FibroGen: Research Funding; BerGenBio: Research Funding; Sun Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding. Burger: Pharmacyclics LLC: Consultancy, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Beigene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel/Accommodations/Expenses, Speakers Bureau. Jain: Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; Aprea Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Beigene: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Honoraria, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cellectis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Konopleva: Novartis: Other: research funding pending, Patents & Royalties: intellectual property rights; Forty Seven: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Patents & Royalties: intellectual property rights, Research Funding; Ascentage: Other: grant support, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Other: grant support, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grant Support, Research Funding; Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Calithera: Other: grant support, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: grant support; Agios: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Ablynx: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Cellectis: Other: grant support; KisoJi: Research Funding; Sanofi: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: grant support, Research Funding; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Patents & Royalties: intellectual property rights. Ravandi: Taiho: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astex: Honoraria, Research Funding; Prelude: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Xencor: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Syros Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. DiNardo: Agios/Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; ImmuneOnc: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Notable Labs: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Foghorn: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb company: Honoraria, Research Funding. Sasaki: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thompson: Genentech: Other: Institution: Advisory/Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Grant/Funding; Amgen: Other: Institution: Honoraria, Research Grant/Funding; AbbVie: Other: Institution: Advisory/Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Grant/Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Other: Institution: Advisory/Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Grant/Funding, Expert Testimony; Pharmacyclics: Other: Institution: Advisory/Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Grant/Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Other: Institution: Advisory/Consultancy, Honoraria. Ferrajoli: BeiGene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board . Jabbour: Amgen, AbbVie, Spectrum, BMS, Takeda, Pfizer, Adaptive, Genentech: Research Fundin
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».