MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3216214594 · doi:10.1176/appi.pn.2021.10.19

International Group Releases New OCD Treatment Standards

2021· article· en· W3216214594 sur OpenAlex
Nick Zagorski

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevuePsychiatric News · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAccreditationTask forcePsychiatryPharmacotherapySpecialtyObsessive compulsiveMedicinePsychologyMedical educationPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Clinical & ResearchFull AccessInternational Group Releases New OCD Treatment StandardsNick ZagorskiNick ZagorskiSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:29 Nov 2021https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2021.10.19AbstractAn expert task force representing 14 nations has published four comprehensive papers detailing the skills and knowledge professionals should have to effectively treat children and adults with obsessive-compulsive disorder.The International Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders Accreditation Task Force (ATF)—a group of more than 60 experts representing 14 nations—has published a comprehensive set of specialty standards for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in children and adults. The task force was created and is overseen by the Canadian Institute for Obsessive Compulsive Disorders (CIOCD), a nonprofit whose central mission is to improve the quality and accessibility of OCD care across the globe.OCD is a prevalent disorder that is a leading cause of medical disability worldwide, said Debbie Sookman, Ph.D., an associate professor of psychiatry at McGill University, specialist at the McGill University Health Center in Montreal, and chair of the OCD ATF. With specialized treatment, many patients with OCD can achieve a positive and sustained response, she said, but there are too few qualified professionals to meet global demand.Evidence-based treatment for OCD begins with specialized cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) that is tailored to the patient’s specific symptoms, distress, and comorbidities, Sookman said. “Current research indicates that pharmacotherapy is often required for severe or intransigent illness, but pharmacotherapy alone is generally not optimal for OCD,” she continued.Medical groups have produced practice guidelines for treating patients with OCD, but the new standards advance the field by creating specific evidence-based knowledge and skills that a professional should have to deliver effective OCD care.The new knowledge and competency standards are divided into four comprehensive papers:Pharmacotherapy for adult OCDPharmacotherapy for pediatric OCDSpecialized CBT for adult OCDSpecialized CBT for pediatric OCD“The content [in these new standards] is broader than that of several [previously published] treatment guidelines,” noted Lorrin Koran, M.D., a professor emeritus of psychiatry at Stanford University and ATF member who coauthored the paper on pharmacotherapy for adults with OCD. Koran was also the chair of the work groups that created APA’s 2007 “Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder” and 2013 “Guideline Watch for OCD.”The new pharmacotherapy standards explore such topics as the presentation and variety of OCD symptoms, the underlying pathology of illness, common medical comorbidities in OCD patients, medication side effects, and the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant OCD, he explained. Every section also clearly defines all relevant terms discussed and includes a list of future research priorities.According to OCD experts, the development of these new standards for specialized OCD treatment represents a transformative advance in the field, as there is growing recognition worldwide that improving the quality and accessibility of evidence-based treatments for OCD is urgently required. “The ATF OCD knowledge and competency standards will serve as the foundation for the development of specialty training programs,” Sookman said.The ATF is currently developing multilevel training protocols and evaluative measures based on these standards to the level of specialized certification and accreditation for clinicians and clinics, respectively. The next phase is the implementation of these standard-based training programs and evaluating their efficacy. ■The entire collection of “Knowledge and Competency Standards for Specialized Treatments for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Throughout the Lifespan” is posted here. ISSUES NewArchived

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,708
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,337
Écart entre enseignants0,304 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle