Penalized regression methods for interaction and mixed-effects models with applications to genomic and brain imaging data
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In high-dimensional (HD) data, where the number of covariates (??) greatly exceeds the number of observations (??), estimation can benefit from the bet-on-sparsity principle, i.e., only a small number of predictors are relevant in the response. This assumption can lead to more interpretable models, improved predictive accuracy, and algorithms that are computationally efficient. In genomic and brain imaging studies, where the sample sizes are particularly small due to high data collection costs, we must often assume a sparse model because there isn't enough information to estimate ?? parameters. For these reasons, penalized regression methods such as the lasso and group-lasso have generated substantial interest since they can set model coefficients exactly to zero. In the penalized regression framework, many approaches have been developed for main effects. However, there is a need for developing interaction and mixed-effects models. Indeed, accurate capture of interactions may hold the potential to better understand biological phenomena and improve prediction accuracy since they may reflect important modulation of a biological system by an external factor. Furthermore, penalized mixed-effects models that account for correlations due to groupings of observations can improve sensitivity and specificity. This thesis is composed primarily of three manuscripts. In the first manuscript, we propose a method called sail for detecting non-linear interactions that automatically enforces the strong heredity property using both the ℓ₁ and ℓ₂ penalty functions. We describe a blockwise coordinate descent procedure for solving the objective function and provide performance metrics on both simulated and real data. The second manuscript develops a general penalized mixed effects model framework to account for correlations in genetic data due to relatedness called ggmix. Our method can accommodate several sparsity-inducing penalties such as the lasso, elastic net and group lasso and also readily handles prior annotation information in the form of weights. Our algorithm has theoretical guarantees of convergence and we again assess its performance in both simulated and real data. The third manuscript describes a novel strategy called eclust for dimension reduction that leverages the effects of an exposure variable with broad impact on HD measures. With eclust, we found improved prediction and variable selection performance compared to methods that do not consider the exposure in the clustering step, or to methods that use the original data as features. We further illustrate this modeling framework through the analysis of three data sets from very different fields, each with HD data, a binary exposure, and a phenotype of interest. We provide efficient implementations of all our algorithms in freely available and open source software.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».