On failure prediction and failure identification modeling in a gas turbine system: a survey of classification approaches in a three-class problem
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Rapid developments in sensor technology, data processing tools and data storage capability have helped fuel an increased appetite for equipment health monitoring in mechanical systems. As a result, the number of sensors and amount of data collected for health monitoring has grown tremendously. It is hoped that by collecting large quantities of operational data, predictive tools can be developed that will provide operational, maintenance and safety benefits. Data mining and machine learning techniques are important tools in addressing the ensuing challenge of extracting useful results from the data collected. In this work, the sensor data from a gas turbine system was analyzed with the objective of failure modeling and prediction. Previous efforts had used a two-class approach for this problem, to distinguish healthy and failed states of the system. In this work, a third class labelled as deteriorated data is added prior to each failure event to explore the ability of machine learning models to provide early warning of upcoming incidents. Several maintenance incidents were recorded by the sensor system in two separate vehicles. Three approaches to selecting training data were used. The first followed a traditional method of randomly selecting data points from all data according to a desired percentage of failed data to include in training, target ratios between failed and healthy data in each data set, as well as target ratios between training and testing data. The second data selection strategy was to consider data related to failure incidents as a whole and select certain incidents to include in training, and the remaining ones to be unseen in testing. The third approach was cross-validation which is typically used as a technique to evaluate how a classifier will perform on unseen data while still using the entirety of the data to train the final classifier. In addition to investigating training and data selection strategies, the effect of hyperparameter optimization was explored as well as the effect of varying the time period of the deteriorated class. Using the gas turbine data, which included 7 failure incidents and 76 predictor variables, a variety of classifier models of the system were developed in a three-class problem to differentiate healthy, deteriorated and failed system states. The classifier methods included support vector machines, Gaussian Naïve Bayes, random forest, adaboost, multilayer perceptron, k-nearest neighbor, and XG boost. Ensemble models were also created to leverage all the individual classifier models that were developed. This paper will describe the comprehensive results that were obtained using the various approaches and combinations, highlighting the respective benefits and limitations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».