MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3217650763 · doi:10.36001/phmconf.2021.v13i1.3052

On failure prediction and failure identification modeling in a gas turbine system: a survey of classification approaches in a three-class problem

2021· article· en· W3217650763 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnnual Conference of the PHM Society · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueEngineering Diagnostics and Reliability
Établissements canadiensNational Research Council Canada
Organismes subventionnairesMinistère de la Défense NationaleUniversity of TorontoNational Research Council CanadaDefence Research and Development Canada
Mots-clésComputer scienceIdentification (biology)Class (philosophy)Data collectionSet (abstract data type)Warning systemData setData miningMachine learningEvent (particle physics)Artificial intelligenceReliability engineeringEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Rapid developments in sensor technology, data processing tools and data storage capability have helped fuel an increased appetite for equipment health monitoring in mechanical systems. As a result, the number of sensors and amount of data collected for health monitoring has grown tremendously. It is hoped that by collecting large quantities of operational data, predictive tools can be developed that will provide operational, maintenance and safety benefits. Data mining and machine learning techniques are important tools in addressing the ensuing challenge of extracting useful results from the data collected.
 In this work, the sensor data from a gas turbine system was analyzed with the objective of failure modeling and prediction. Previous efforts had used a two-class approach for this problem, to distinguish healthy and failed states of the system. In this work, a third class labelled as deteriorated data is added prior to each failure event to explore the ability of machine learning models to provide early warning of upcoming incidents. Several maintenance incidents were recorded by the sensor system in two separate vehicles. Three approaches to selecting training data were used. The first followed a traditional method of randomly selecting data points from all data according to a desired percentage of failed data to include in training, target ratios between failed and healthy data in each data set, as well as target ratios between training and testing data. The second data selection strategy was to consider data related to failure incidents as a whole and select certain incidents to include in training, and the remaining ones to be unseen in testing. The third approach was cross-validation which is typically used as a technique to evaluate how a classifier will perform on unseen data while still using the entirety of the data to train the final classifier. In addition to investigating training and data selection strategies, the effect of hyperparameter optimization was explored as well as the effect of varying the time period of the deteriorated class.
 Using the gas turbine data, which included 7 failure incidents and 76 predictor variables, a variety of classifier models of the system were developed in a three-class problem to differentiate healthy, deteriorated and failed system states. The classifier methods included support vector machines, Gaussian Naïve Bayes, random forest, adaboost, multilayer perceptron, k-nearest neighbor, and XG boost. Ensemble models were also created to leverage all the individual classifier models that were developed. This paper will describe the comprehensive results that were obtained using the various approaches and combinations, highlighting the respective benefits and limitations.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,051
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,362

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,214
Écart entre enseignants0,170 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle