Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) of SARS‐CoV‐2, a global urgent public health alert!
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The most recent identification of the Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has added fuel to the close to 2-years' seemingly eternal flame of the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.1 Omicron was first identified in Botswana earlier in November. It was reported to World Health Organization (WHO) from South Africa on November 24, 2021, which was designated as a variant of concern (VOC) on November 26, 2021.1 Omicron contains a large number of mutations that were previously reported in other VOCs including at least 32 mutations in the spike protein alone compared to the 16 mutations in the already highly infectious delta variant, in addition to other proteins such as NSP12 and NSP14 that are essential for viral replication. The Omicron variant is thought to be at least three times more infectious than the original SARS-CoV-2 and possibly more so than the delta variant. The variant has so far been detected in at least 38 countries including Australia, Botswana, the European Union, Hong Kong, Israel, the United Kingdom, and the United States. At the time of writing this Editorial, a number of countries including Brazil, Canada, the European Union Indonesia, Iran, Israel, Maldives, New Zealand, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Thailand, the United Kingdom, and the United States have implemented travel restrictions to eight southern African countries including Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, and Zimbabwe where the Omicron was likely originated from while Israel bars entry to all foreign nationals. Some countries have issued partial lockdown and strict quarantine of the infected individuals. There are numerous urgent medical and scientific questions concerning the Omicron variant that need to be addressed. The first question is whether Omicron causes more severe disease and/or prolonged infections. While it is possible that the extensive mutations could render the virus less virulent, the chance is very small. In contrast, the highly infectious nature of this variant suggests that, once an individual is infected, there is likely wider and faster spread between cells, tissues, and organs, causing more severe tissue damages, hence more severe pathologies and disease manifestations. It is also possible that the variant causes a prolonged infection with inapparent symptoms and consequently confers virus spread to more people. The high infectious nature could be due to its robust replication fitness resulting in higher viral load and production of more variants. It is likely that more than one of these mechanisms might come into play. These clinical data should be available in the next few weeks. The second question is whether the mutations in viral Nsp12-RdRp and Nsp14-Exo confer a higher mutation rate seen in the Omicron variant. Through mutation and adaptation, viral variants can efficiently evade the host immunity, resulting in prolonged infection and virus spread to others. The third question is whether the current vaccines, which are entirely based on the original SARS-CoV-2 strain are protective against this new variant. This information could be quickly obtained by examining neutralization antibodies against an Omicron pseudovirus or an authentic infectious clone. It is noted that all four early Botswana Omicron variant patients were fully vaccinated, indicating a possible vaccine escape. However, we will likely not know whether the current vaccines are protective against severe disease until more clinical data are available. Regardless of the outcome, it seems prudent to immediately jumpstart the production of a vaccine against this new variant. In fact, numerous pharmaceutical companies have wasted no time and announced plans for developing vaccines against the new variant. Governments should join forces with vaccine companies to develop an efficient strategy to best deal with this rapidly emerging medical urgency. New variants of SARS-CoV-2 have been reported weekly if not daily. Poor public health infrastructure, lower vaccination rate, and presence of a large number of immunocompromised populations that have weaker immune protection and are more susceptible to infection could become the fertile ground for breeding new variants. Thus, a global concerted effort among the government agencies, pharmaceutical/biotech industries, and academic and healthcare institutions is required to efficiently contain this pandemic. The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests. Shou-Jiang Gao, Haitao Guo, and Guangxiang Luo conceived, wrote and revised the paper. Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,021 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».