Single-Cell Analysis of Human B Lymphoid and Neutrophil/Monocyte Lineage Restriction
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Lifelong production of most types of mature blood cells is sustained by a small population of cells with extensive regenerative potential. However, the detailed steps that restrict multipotent or even bipotent human hematopoietic cells to any single lineage remain poorly understood. Those that segregate the human B-lymphoid and neutrophil/monocyte (NM) lineages are of particular interest as these appear to identify a stage that might control the different properties of human leukemias that display perturbed NM and/or B-cell programs. To undertake a refined analysis of this normal lineage restriction process in human cells, we first devised a culture system that permits it to be tracked clonally and efficiently (50%). Initial experiments showed this could be achieved using a combination of multiple stromal cell types and human growth factor-supplemented medium. To elucidate the intervening transitional steps we then used multiplexed flow cytometry to compare the progeny generated in this culture system over a 2-week time course from previously defined lymphoid progenitor-enriched (P-L), NM progenitor-enriched (P-NM) and less restricted P-mix cord blood (CB) subsets. The results suggested that gain of CD45RA (RA) expression and loss of CLEC12A (C) expression appeared to accompany the sequential restriction of early CD34+ progenitors first to cells with dual NM+B-lineage potential and then just to B-lineage potential. Subsequent tracking of the lineage outputs of CD34+ RA-C- cells initially produced in larger numbers from unfractionated CD34+ CB cells either in vitro or in xenografted immunodeficient mice, confirmed the CD34+ RA-C- subset to be highly enriched in cells with dual NM+B potential. In contrast, co-generated CD45RA+ (RA+C-) and RA+CLEC12A+ (RA+C+) phenotypes displayed separate B- and NM lineage-restricted activity, respectively, as indicated by their largely exclusive clonal outputs of CD19+ pre-B and CD14+/CD15+ NM precursors. In agreement with these phenotypically established separate NM and B-lineage outputs, RA+C- cells were found to contain higher levels of B-lineage-associated gene transcripts (e.g., DNTT, CD79A, and EBF1), whereas RA+C+ cells contained higher levels of the NM transcription factor mRNAs encoded by SPI1 and CEBPA. In a further optimized stroma-free liquid culture system, the RA-C- cells could be shown to produce continuously RA+C- and RA+C+ progeny after another 3-4 days, and also RA-C- progeny which are not produced from more restricted RA+C- and RA+C+ cells, suggesting that the acquired expression of RA precedes the separation of NM and B-lineage potential that is then marked by the differential activation of C expression in RA+ cells. To examine more precisely how the process of B+NM restriction to a single lineage might be related to successive cell cycles, we labeled RA-C- cells with carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE) to enable the phenotypes and growth potential of the the progeny obtained after 6 days to be directly related to their prior division histories. This revealed extensive heterogeneity in the overall distribution of the initial progeny cell cycle times but with a clear segregation in the outputs of the faster and slower dividing cells. Notably, the faster dividers produced ultimately small M+B or uni-lineage clones whereas the initially slow dividers subsequently produced larger clones, 25% of which still contained CD34+ cells or N+M+B progeny. Taken together, these findings identify new hallmark phenotypic changes that identify a critical step in the lineage restriction of primitive human hematopoietic cells with dual NM+B-lineage potential and a previously unknown association of this process with a shortening of their cell cycle transit time. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».