Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Handbook of Art and Design Librarianship. Edited by Amanda Gluibizzi and Paul Glassman. London: Facet Publishing, 2010. 330 pp. 115.48 CDN. ISBN: 978-1-85604- 702-9 As Editor Amanda Gluibizzi states in Introduction to The Handbook of Art and Design Librarianship, art and design students differ from other types of academic users, and meeting information of these creative researchers poses unique challenges for librarians. This work brings together essays on a wide range of topics that are intended to guide art librarians in their day to day work, including carrying out their administrative responsibilities, developing and maintaining collections, designing innovative and relevant programming, and creating usable space. While is on American libraries, work is intended to have an purview and seeks to maintain a global focus through its inclusion of chapters dealing with libraries in UK, Qatar and Canada. Although not explicitly stated, this book is intended for art and design librarians at all stages of their careers, from recent graduates to experienced professionals. Authors come from a range of institutions and hold a wide variety of positions. Most chapters include useful bibliographies for further research. The book is divided into four sections. Part I, Roles and Responsibilities, includes chapters on governance and administration of art and design libraries, trends in art librarianship based on an international survey, accreditation for art and design libraries, and evolving role of visual arts liaison librarians. This section exemplifies what is perhaps one of greatest weaknesses of Handbook: while serving as a good starting point, many chapters are just too general to be very useful for more experienced art and design information professional. For example, Judy Dyki's chapter Accreditation and Visual Arts Libraries fails to provide sufficient detail with respect to unique requirements and challenges of accreditation reports relating to art and design libraries to assist librarians who are charged with preparing such formal self- study reports. In addition, surveys are alluded to in a number of chapters throughout book, including in this section, but methodology is not described in detail and actual survey is neither included nor referenced in bibliography at end of chapter. The chapters in Part II, Materials and Collections Management, on the opportunities and difficulties art libraries face in current collections environment and include discussions about art special collections; working simultaneously with print and digital collections and strategies for de-accessioning; risks and possibilities of digital prospects; scholarly communication and art publications; and cataloguing with visual user in mind (p. 49). Included in this section is one of strongest essays in volume, Beyond Monograph: Transformations in Scholarly Communication and Their Impact on Art Librarianship by Patrick Tomlin. It provides an overview and examination of changing nature of scholarly communication and burgeoning impact of those changes on art and design library (p. 92). As Tomlin points out, up to this point art librarianship has not been actively engaged with issues of open access and scholarship in arts. In Part III, Teaching and Learning, chapters explore the notion of visual literacy as an essential part of an art librarian's position; methods for weaving information literacy instruction into a studio class; working with image databases as sources of information; culturally sensitive art information literacy in societies with religious restrictions on image and media consumption; targeting multiple literacies - including visual and tactile learners - in art instruction; and art history student's special research and information needs (p. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,015 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,008 | 0,012 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,023 | 0,013 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,069 | 0,089 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».