Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In December 1998, the idea for a special issue of the Journal focusing on Race and Housing in Post-World War II was born when Amanda Seligman and I sat down for coffee in Springfield at the Illinois History Symposium. Both students of Northwestern University professor Henry C. Binford, albeit a quarter-century apart, Amanda and I chatted about her research on racial transition on Chicago's west side and about other graduate students, who were also increasing our understanding of residential segregation in the city after the Second World War. This issue is the result of that discussion two-and-a-half years ago. It aims at bringing Journal readers some of the freshest research on racial polarization in Chicago housing with three articles by historians who received the Ph.D. in the late 1990s: D. Bradford Hunt from the University of California at Berkeley, Wendy Plotkin from the University of Illinois at Chicago, and Amanda Seligman from Northwestern University. With special pleasure, the Journal also recognizes all three as past recipients of the Society's King V. Hostick Award which supports dissertation research on Illinois history. In addition to securing the contributions of these young scholars, I have also turned to two old hands to provide a broader perspective. In their books, edited collections, and scholarly articles, Raymond A. Mohl and W. Roger Biles have explored how cities, including Chicago, changed demographically, physically, politically, and economically since the Great Depression. In this issue, Ray Mohl provides a national context for patterns present in Chicago. By contrast, Roger Biles offers a Chicago-focused overview. In their respective studies of racially restrictive covenants, blockbusting, and public housing at the Robert Taylor Homes, Plotkin, Seligman, and Hunt paint a picture of white and black Chicagoans unwilling and unable to transcend the barrier of race to live together. Indeed, as Mohl and Biles note here and elsewhere, this phenomenon has been a central facet of Chicago's 20th-century history. In the decades beyond those examined in this special issue, despite legislative and judicial action against discrimination and civil rights victories, racial polarization has hardly weakened. Instead, it continues the 21st century as an issue with which Chicagoans will likely long contend. Chicago policy makers grapple with the consequences of decisions made decades ago. In 1997, the wrecker's ball claimed its first Robert Taylor Homes1 building at 3919 S. Federal Street, a structure judged impossible to renovate.' Since then, demolition at Taylor and at other Chicago Housing Authority complexes has continued. By December 1998, 1,800 public housing units had been destroyed, setting former residents in motion.2 Most recently, in February 2001, the CHA gave preliminary approval to a plan for the redevelopment of the remaining Taylor buildings into mixed-- income communities.3 Will a rebuilt Taylor, or any Chicago neighborhood, draw a mix of black and white residents? The Census of 2000 indicates that the prospect remains questionable. Although racially restrictive covenants can no longer be used to exclude African Americans and others from Chicago's neighborhoods and suburbs, white and black Chicagoans still do not live in close proximity. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».