MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W323257099

Building Another Politics: The Contemporary Anti-Authoritarian Current in the U.S. and Canada

2012· article· en· W323257099 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chris Dixon

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnarchist studies · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAnarchism and Radical Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAuthoritarianismPoliticsGrassrootsSociologySocial movementFeminismPolitical sciencePolitical economyDemocracyMedia studiesLawGender studies
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Recent decades have seen the convergence of a variety of anti-authoritarian politics and broader-based movements in the US and Canada. Coming out of this convergence, a growing set of activists and organisers are developing shared politics, practices, and sensibdities based in overlapping areas of work. Those creating these politics compose a political tendency, what I call the anti-authoritarian current, which cuts across a range of left social movements. Broadly conceived, what distinguishes this current is its commitment to combining anti-authoritarian, anti-capitalist politics with grassroots organising among ordinary, non-activist people. I argue that the anti-authoritarian current, in effect, budds on the best features of the anarchist tradition whde drawing on substantial contributions from other political formations and movement experiences. Based on indepth interviews with organisers in six North American cities, this essay traces the strands that have led into the anti-authoritarian current and explores the defining principles of its politics. Keywords: anarchism, another politics, anti-authoritarian, organising, prefigurative politics, prison abolitionism, women of colour feminism INTRODUCTION The period leading to die first United States Social Forum in Adanta, Georgia, during the summer of 2007 saw a flowering of endiusiastic discussions in and across movements in the US Under the slogan 'another world is possible, another US is necessary', this historic gadiering brought together more rhan 10,000 people for learning, sharing, and budding movements.2 One important contribution to these discussions was a perceptive article featured in die activist magazine Left Turn by one of its editors, Max Uhlenbeck. An experienced organiser, Uhlenbeck is someone with his finger on the pulse of a lot of dynamic movement activity in North America. He observed: Those of us who are not interested in starting a political party, and have even shied away from cadre organizing of any kind, have found it hard to articulate what exacdy it is we would want to see on the local, regional, or even national level, much less how we might organize towards such a goal ... We know we are critical of the non-profit world - increasingly integrated into the corporate model - as a major vehicle for structural social change. We are critical of the centralized political party structure, whether it be the neoliberal Democrats or the small leftist 'revolutionary sects' that continue to operate in near anonymity around the country. On the other side of the spectrum, the frustrating antiorganizational and sectarian tendencies within many of the contemporary anarchist movements, coupled with the predominantly white subcultures surrounding them, have left much to be desired. The alternative for many of us has been to continue to identify with a broad-based, but still rather vague, political tendency - sometimes described as the 'anti-authoritarian, anti-capitalist, non-sectarian left'.3 Uhlenbeck, in these precious few phrases, managed to put words to something that many have been discussing, but few have written about at any length.4 Budding on his description, this article is about the 'anti-authoritarian, anti-capitalist, non-sectarian left' across the United States and Canada. This tendency puUs together a growing set of activists and organisers who are developing shared ideas and approaches based in overlapping areas of work. At the core, what distinguishes them is their commitment to combining anti-authoritarian, anti-capitalist poUtics with grassroots organising among ordinary, non-activist people. In doing this, they use many labels to describe themselves - abolitionists, anarchists, anti-authoritarians, anti-capitalists, autonomists, and radicals, among others - and some choose to organise without political labels. Yet, together, they are a political current that cuts across a range of left social movements in North America. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,126
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,916

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0500,023
Communication savante0,0090,002
Science ouverte0,0020,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,080
Tête enseignante GPT0,370
Écart entre enseignants0,290 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations24
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnarchist studiesMême sujetAnarchism and Radical PoliticsTravaux en français237 207