MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W323650292

Innovation in the Public Sector: Linking Capacity and Leadership

2012· article· en· W323650292 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œinnovation journal · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiquePublic Procurement and Policy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPublic sectorPrivate sectorContext (archaeology)New public managementCorporate governancePoliticsCompetition (biology)EntrepreneurshipPublic administrationPolitical scienceEconomicsPublic relationsSociologyEconomic growthManagementEconomy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Victor Bekkers, Jurian Edelenbos and Bram Steijn (editors). Innovation in the Public Sector: Linking Capacity and Leadership. Governance and Public Management Series. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Reviewed by Karl LofgrenWhile the notion of innovation has been on the international political agenda for 20 years now, accompanied by a massive interest among students of economics and business studies, the concept has been remarkably disregarded in the academic field of public administration. Innovation as a concept has almost become synonymous with entrepreneurship in the private sector, whereas the public sector has been perceived as a natural opponent to innovation.In that context, the collection of chapters edited by Bekkers, Edelenbos and Steijn fills a gap in our body of knowledge, and makes a valuable contribution to a new research agenda in which the public sector is an important constituent in our endeavour to become a truly innovative society. As the editors argue in their introductory chapter, innovation represents a challenge to public administration in two different ways. First, the public sector, and subsequently public administration, constitutes the foundation for a more innovation-driven economy. Without a public sector adapted and geared up to a different form of knowledge based economy, the aim of making society and the economy more innovative will inevitably fail. Second, a future society requires that the public sector itself becomes innovative in order to face a number of challenges. Societal threats such as climate changes, crime and international economic competition force the public sector to rethink the choice of priorities, solutions and instruments. In particular, this is because, as the three editors point out, a number of social and political developments (e.g. individualisation, globalisation etc) in (Western/European) societies have undercut some of the 'linkages. between various social actors thereby depriving governments the capacity of solving (cross-sectoral) 'wicked problems.. Undoubtedly, this requires a new way of considering our current forms of governance and choice of policy instruments.The collection is composed of an introductory chapter, nine contributions which include both empirical, theoretical and conceptual pieces, and a final discussion. The contributions cover a range of subjects from case studies on the management of innovation studies to comparative studies on innovation in different states. If I, as reviewer, should pick a few good chapters I would in particular stress the conceptual contribution by Christopher Pollitt on innovation in the public sector, and the chapter by Lember, Kalvet and Kattel on public sector innovation at the urban level and the role of procurement. The former, by Pollitt, puts the whole concept of innovation into a broader conceptual and historical framework, and warns against 'off-the-shelf' models and theories of innovation in which frameworks developed for production innovation in the private sector are uncritically exported to the public sector. Pollitt argues that innovation in the public sector needs to be studied from a long-term perspective in which we over time see if we can identify any common denominators. That context matters is also something emphasised in the overall conclusion of the book - local relations, values and interactions matter for innovation. The latter chapter by Lember, Kalvet and Kattel is interesting insofar it provides a good comparative study of a number of innovations, mainly transport-and IT-systems, in a number of Baltic Sea cities with a special emphasis on procurement, and the relationship between the public procurer and the private contractor/supplier. The chapter demonstrates how the public sector through procurement affects the innovation of new processes and products (which later can be commercially exploited).While there is every reason to applaud the initiative by the editors to compile a selection of papers in the novel field of innovation of the public sector, there is also reason to draw the attention to some less fortunate aspects of the volume. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,691
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,003
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,200
Tête enseignante GPT0,274
Écart entre enseignants0,074 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle