MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W324148967 · doi:10.1353/ff.2007.a224744

New Perspectives on Environmental Justice: Gender, Sexuality and Activism (review)

2007· article· en· W324148967 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joyce M. Barry

Notice bibliographique

RevueNWSA Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEnvironmental Justice and Health Disparities
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHuman sexualityEnvironmental justiceSociologyGender studiesEconomic JusticeEnvironmental ethicsCriminologyPolitical scienceLawPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: New Perspectives on Environmental Justice: Gender, Sexuality and Activism Joyce M. Barry (bio) New Perspectives on Environmental Justice: Gender, Sexuality and Activism by Rachel Stein. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2004, 287 pp., $62.00 hardcover, $24.95 paper. In 2004, Kenyan environmental justice activist Wangari Mathai became the first African woman to win the Nobel Peace Prize for her mobilization of African women and their planting of thirty million trees over the last thirty years. Also in 2004, U.S. environmental justice activist Margie Eugene Richard became the first African American woman to win the Goldman Environmental Prize for her work against the petrochemical industry in Norco, Louisiana. [End Page 223] Environmental justice activists (primarily women) are receiving past due recognition for their work in social and environmental equity causes. This recognition also is noted in Rachel Stein's edited collection. This promising, interdisciplinary work includes essays from scholars and practitioners of environmental justice, and gives gender and sexuality considerations primacy in environmental justice theory and praxis. This book is invaluable for activists in environmental justice causes, and for teachers of Women's Studies and environmental studies. Stein's text is an important contribution to these fields considering the neglect of gender in past environmental justice collections. For example, only two articles on gender are contained in lauded environmental justice works by Bunyan Bryant, David Camacho, and Daniel Faber. Stein's collection is, indeed, long overdue, as it highlights "issues of gender equality and sexual equality that have been embedded within the environmental justice work to make these aspects of the movements more visible" (5). Women have had an overwhelming presence, historically, in environmental justice campaigns and currently "compose approximately 90 percent of the active membership" of many environmental justice groups (2). Hopefully, this collection will prompt further analyses into women's participation in such causes, thereby expanding environmental justice thought and action in fruitful and unexpected ways. Greta Gaard's "Toward an Ecofeminist Queer Theory,"which unites ecofeminism and queer theory, sets the stage for other chapters on the intersections of gender, sexuality, and environmental justice, such as Catriona Sandilands's work on lesbian spaces in Oregon, and Beth Berila's article on the intersections between sexuality and environmental justice. These essays are the best examples of how this text seeks to link studies in environmental justice, gender, and sexuality in heretofore new ways. Nancy Unger provides a sweeping history into the ways in which women (of various races and social classes) have been linked to the environment and environmental justice concerns. Unger's historical claim about women's involvement is supported by Julie Sze's study of the large numbers of inner city mothers of asthmatic children who form collectives to fight for healthier environments, and by Robert Verchick's look at the impact of feminist legal theory on environmental justice activism. Also noteworthy is Giovanna DiChirro's chilling exposé of genetic studies conducted by the National Institute of Health. While this book is vital for its gender and sexuality redress in the field of gender studies and environmental thought and practice, it does have minimal weaknesses. Part Four: Studies in Literature and Popular Culture is long (with five essays) for a text of this kind. Considering that political-economic arrangements that aid and abet industry at the expense of the poor and people of color are the very reasons why some become engaged in environmental justice struggles, scholarship more focused on health and [End Page 224] activism issues seems more fitting than those providing textual analyses of popular culture artifacts. This collection also fails to make global environmental justice connections, which are especially important considering the current ravages of the global environment, and the great numbers of people engaged in environmental justice activism worldwide. The only essay with a global perspective is Anne E. Lucas's article, which explores the ways in which U.S. industry is polluting the Canadian Artic and the breast milk of Inuit women. Overall, though, this collection is an unprecedented study that places gender and sexuality at the center of analysis. Ultimately, it is an important resource for academics and activists working in Women's Studies and environmental...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,032

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,008
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,004
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,370
Écart entre enseignants0,326 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNWSA JournalMême sujetEnvironmental Justice and Health DisparitiesTravaux en français237 207