The effects of collective racial esteem on African American undergraduate male involvement in public four-year institutions of higher education.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This dissertation examines the influence of collective racial esteem (CRE) on the quantity and type of involvement for African American male undergraduate students in public four-year institutions of higher education in the U.S. In addition, this relationship is examined to determine if differences exist across gender (male and female), and institutional variables (specifically, public HBCUs vs. public PWIs). The persistence and graduation of African American males at four-year institutions of higher education has increased in past decades, but still remains consistently and significantly lower than that of their non-African American male counterparts (Planty et al., 2009). African American male retention rates are also lower than their female counterparts of the same ethnic background. These data continue to be a reality, despite the extensive literature on African American students in college. Using multiple regression, hierarchical logistic regression, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA), this exploratory research design assessed the predictive potential of CRE to certain involvement variables established by the literature on African American male undergraduates. The predictor variables included in the study were the four sub-scales of CRE: Private CRE, Public CRE, Identity Salience, and Membership CRE. Independent variables were gender and institutional type. The criterion variables were quantity of campus involvement, decision to join an ethnic/minority organization, and faculty and peer interaction. Dependent variables were the four sub-scales of CRE. The study found Membership CRE to be a significant predictor of quantity of campus involvement for African American males; Identity Salience to be a significant predictor of decision to join an ethnic/minority organization for African American males; and Private CRE and Membership CRE to be a significant predictor of peer interaction for African American females. Significant differences were found between African American male and female CRE scores, and between students attending HBCUs and those attending PWIs. This study added a significant contribution to the literature for African American students by examining the effects of CRE on college involvement. This study concluded by suggesting that state-level and institutional level decision-makers should work to incorporate CRE into the design, implementation, and assessment of support services for African American students. Resources to support the enhancement of CRE should be adequately staffed and funded in the face of increasing diversity within post-secondary institutions. Individual practitioners and scholars could benefit from an understanding of CRE and its influence on student interactions and involvement, particularly at PWIs. Greater understanding of
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».