Seeking the "New Reality": CRE Loans in Past and Present Tenses Aren't Any Fun. Will Future Tense Improve?
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] Community banks' involvement with commercial real estate can be broken into three phases. There is an aggressive past that is still being paid for; a present that in many markets mixes inactivity with occasional frenetic competition; and a future where the economics will be very different, and where the seeds of potential further trouble have already been planted. That's not exactly an upbeat summary. And it's a composite picture. But when you are dealing with the aftermath of a crisis, simply still being around to talk about it has a great deal to be said for it. The worst is behind us, says Keith Leggett, ABA senior economist. CRE asset quality is improving, vacancies overall are falling, and prices in many markets are firming, albeit at lower levels. Industrywide, FDIC reported in late February, net charge-offs fell by 40.2% in fourth-quarter 2011, versus fourth-quarter 2012, with charge-offs on real estate construction and land development loans, a facet of CRE lending, falling by 62.4%. Noncurrent loan balances in two key categories fell, too real estate construction and land development loans, by 13.2% in the fourth quarter, compared to the third, likewise nonfarm nonresidential real estate loans, by 4%. On the other hand, observers say many community banks have seen their CRE activity shrink, between falling activity, retiring debt, and write-offs. It's a regrouping time for most institutions, says Scott Miller, principal in the risk consulting practice at Crowe Horwath LLP. This has been a real negative environment for people--they are getting fatigued. Playing out the hand Many of the bank failures brought on by CRE have been processed by FDIC. However, write-downs of existing loans in portfolio continue. Miller says he doesn't find much that's positive yet on the CRE front. These days, he says a good deal of his practice touches on clients' loan loss reserve, and he frequently has to push the question: Are we really going to get all of these problem real estate loans worked out? Some banks simply lack the capital to take a harshly realistic view on their CRE portfolios, says Miller, and so they are currently doing a dance until they next see regulators. That will correct itself at the next exam, he explains. Miller's view may sound tough, but bankers also number among the realists. Georgia banker Dan Blanton, a veteran real estate lender with real estate industry experience, as well, brooks no middle ground. this environment, you have to get this stuff off your books, says Blanton. You can't sit on property either. While some bankers say examiners push too hard for disposal of Other Real Estate Owned (OREO), Blanton points to stagnant prices and shrugs, I don't know when values are going to return. In other words, cut your losses and move on. every bad loan has to be written off. Bankers have been engaging in workouts where they can. Most of those interviewed say they found little they didn't already know in the interagency Policy Statement on Prudent Commercial Real Estate Loan Workouts, published in October 2009. However, Michelle Lucci, a former banker and examiner and now CRE risk management consultant for Bankers Toolbox, sees evidence in FDIC's quarterly numbers that a great deal of CRE debt has been rewritten in hopes of successful workouts. (Bankers Toolbox, an ABA-endorsed company, offers CRE stress testing services.) There are banks, or even markets, where CRE troubles didn't reach debacle levels. Not all community banks held their noses and jumped in the same way, says Constantine Tino Korologos, managing director, Deloitte Corporate Finance LLC. He points out that some of the orphan properties out there--e.g. pristine new strip malls sitting empty throughout the crisis--weren't even bank-financed. Many were projects pushed along by investment banks anxious to generate product for commercial real estate mortgage conduits. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle