Atlas of Diagnostic Radiology of the Horse: Diseases of the Front and Hind Limbs, 2nd Edition
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The material in this 2nd edition was presented in 2 separate volumes in the 1st edition. The 2nd edition contains approximately 50% new material and is arranged in a series of sections in which the different parts of the fore and hind limbs are discussed. A total of 682 cases are presented. Typically, each case is accompanied by a number of illustrations with a short paragraph, or so, of text explaining the abnormalities. Frequent use is made of line diagrams, often with annotation to clarify the abnormalities. No references are provided. There are some comments made in the text for which it would be interesting to have supporting data; for example, on page 22, various shapes of the navicular bone are described and are said to be genetically determined and that certain shapes have a greater susceptibility to the development of navicular disease. The section describing the radiographic lesions observed in navicular disease is particularly good. The criteria for the diagnosis of navicular disease are presented as a series of cases, each illustrating different features, and described as being significant changes that are present in some sound horses, mainly lame horses, or always lame horses. In several sections, summary schematic diagrams located at the end of the section illustrate the abnormalities presented. A very good series of cases illustrating the variability in the normal and abnormal development of the common sites of osteochondrosis in the stifle and hock are presented. Several cases illustrate the use that can be made of contrast studies in joints and bursal structures. The comments on the back cover of the text suggest that clear descriptions of the diagnosis and differential diagnoses are given. This is certainly true with respect to the radiographic diagnoses, where clear but brief descriptions are given. This is less true for the differential diagnoses. In most cases, the differential diagnoses are determined by comparison of the cases in the same section. Essentially, there is no text to explain why a specific diagnosis was made. For example, figure 116 illustrates ischemic necrosis of the 1st phalanx in a foal without any explanation as to how this is differentiated from infection. The book is printed on good quality glossy paper. Overall, the quality of the illustrations is good. However, in a relative minority of illustrations, the quality is poorer. In some of the cases with less obvious radiographic lesions, line diagrams accompanied the images. In most cases the lines were helpful, but in some cases, for example figure 41, the lines did not help one in observing the lesions on the radiograph. This degree of range in illustration quality is to be expected in an atlas of this nature. Occasional typographical and grammatical errors were encountered, but these minor defects do not significantly detract from the overall quality of the text. This volume is appropriate for practising equine clinicians and for residents in radiology and surgery for both systematic study and for reference. Most radiologists will be familiar with the majority of the material but will find it a useful reference text, as there are a number of pearls that make its purchase worthwhile. The 2nd edition contains sufficient new material to justify its purchase by those who already own the 1st edition.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,011 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,157 | 0,093 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».