Thomas R. Berger. (2006, March). Conciliator's Final Report: "The Nunavut Project"
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Thomas R. Berger. (2006, March). Conciliator's Final Report: Nunavut Project In a controversial report, Thomas Berger recommended that key to improve representation of Inuit in territorial government workforce is to expand a program of bilingual English-Inuktitut education from kindergarten to grade 12. His emphasis on importance of primary and secondary education to prepare Inuit for workforce participation at all levels is a necessary and sensible response to federal territorial bickering about responsibility for improving work-force participation of Inuit. However, gains he projects from expanding bilingual education--even if he were not underestimating challenges of implementation--cannot be a centre-piece for reform without taking into account equally serious challenges of improving overall educational quality and directly tackling issues of socio-economic disadvantage. BACKGROUND The Territory of Nunavut was created as part of settlement of outstanding land claim of Inuit. The settlement included creation of a new public government in Canada's Eastern Arctic, representing all citizens living in newly created territory. The new territorial government has powers similar to those of a province in Canada, including responsibility for education; however, Nunavut is unique in Canada because 85 per cent of population are members of a single Aboriginal group, Inuit. The settlement also included a comprehensive Land Claim Agreement, with constitutional status, between Government of Canada and Inuit representatives. Apart from typical provisions concerning issues of land title and environmental management, Land Claim Agreement contains a commitment in Article 23 'to increase Inuit participation in government employment in Nunavut Settlement Area to a representative level. Berger calls Article 23 equity clause for a majority (2006, p. 14). Eighty-five per cent employment by 2020 is goal, within all occupational groupings and grade levels. (Nunavut Land Claim Agreement, 1993, Art.23.1.1). Currently, Inuit employment is stalled at approximately 45 per cent, and is concentrated in administrative and support positions. The commitment to Inuit employment is crucially important for equity in territory. It is an effort to open up economic opportunities to Inuit and ensure Inuit are represented in bureaucracy which has had a strong political impact on territory. There have been tensions over implementation of land claim in general and Article 23 in particular between federal and territorial government and Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated, organization representing Inuit. These tensions date back before creation of territory in 1999. (1) A key issue is Canada's responsibility for future steps, if any, required to improve representation of Inuit in Nunavut's public service. In 2005, three parties agreed to appointment of Thomas Berger as conciliator, a person identified as a recognized problem solver who could make a neutral assessment of issues and provide parties with recommendations that may resolve our differences (Director General, Implementation Branch, Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, cited in Berger, 2006, p. 2). Berger has extensive, high profile experience with Aboriginal issues in Canada and internationally. A former judge, he is best known for Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Inquiry in late 1970s, which halted a massive planned pipeline development in interest of Aboriginal people and their Iands in Western Arctic. BERGER'S REPORT AND THE NUNAVUT PROJECT Berger starts from powerful observation that the objective of Article 23 has not nearly been realized (p. 17). He goes on to fault all parties for focusing more on question of where responsibility for that failure lies than working to address squarely question of how to achieve objectives in territory. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,141 | 0,060 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».