MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W328901535

"The Camera Made Me Do It": Female Identity and Troubling Archives

2004· article· en· W328901535 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeanne Perreault, Patricia A. Levin

Notice bibliographique

RevueMosaic (Winnipeg) · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiquePhotography and Visual Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPortraitSubjectivityIdentity (music)ReferentPoliticsObject (grammar)ArtMateriality (auditing)AestheticsVisual artsArt historyHistoryLawPhilosophy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This essay reads the photographs and compositions of Montreal artist Nicole Jolicoeur, examining her use of famous nineteenth-century archival collections. It argues that Jolicoeur's reconstructions of old images of women open aesthetic and ethical issues for viewers as well as for herself, culminating in a series of self-portraits. ********** Archive has become an enormously flexible term in thinking about the place to which we turn when seeking materials for our scholarly or creative works. In itself, has become the model of repositories, not just of documents but of any fragmentary hoardings, like memory, for example. This essay considers the extended archive that a contemporary Montreal artist uses and abuses in her recreation of the photographic image of female subjectivity. Nicole Jolicoeur incorporates questions about the material and materiality of images in her reconstructions of nineteenth-century photographs and in her series of self-portraits. The relation of the referent (the photographed) first to the image then to Jolicoeur's transformations becomes a central aesthetic and ethical/political issue for her viewers, as it is for herself. Her processes and her creations offer an opportunity to reconsider the cultural weight of an archive and the complexities of intervening in those formidable sites. As an artist and a feminist, Jolicoeur exerts a will to power in her reshaping of photographic images that invites further attention to female identity and the blurred boundaries of artist and object. We will trace the movement of Jolicoeur's work as she spirals closer to the self-portraits of her most recent activity. Picture the artist at work in her studio. Taking delight in the found materials, old and new books with troubling images, she delves into these ghostly remains, claiming the photographs for her varied appropriations. The studio is large and bright and one can feel the energy of ideas here as well as see the material results of Jolicoeur's encounters with others' photographs. It is in this place that Jolicoeur turns the investigative documents of the medical clinics and the private collections of religious orders into new work--her work. Jolicoeur's interventions require processing, repossessing, and finally, a strategic redeployment of archival photographs in order to make them into something else--not a souvenir, but an image that defies the petrifying effects of the camera. The camera's productions repose in archives, material, and the metaphoric. Two of the archives Jolicoeur takes on consist of collections of nineteenth-century photographs. One is the famous archive of photographs of (mostly) women held in the asylum at Salpetriere, taken under the direction of the radical reformer Dr. Jean Martin Charcot. Great numbers of these photographs have been reproduced, and they are familiar to anyone with even a passing interest in psychoanalysis. The other archive is a collection of photographs of a young woman, Therese Martin, taken by her sister when both were Carmelite nuns at Lisieux in France. Therese was marked early by her deep religious devotion. After her death she was beatified and canonized, her painted (not photographed) image ubiquitous in Roman Catholic worlds. Recently, the photographs of Therese and life in the convent were published, the photographic image displacing the dated sentimental portrait. For Jolicoeur, these photographs come into her hands as reproductions in books. The copies have no status or value as objects beyond what the bookstore determines for them. While often denotes a repository in a specific physical location to which a scholar must travel, these archives come to us. These resources are archives not only of objects (the photographs), but of memory and meaning attached to the moment of creation and the subsequent patina of history and meaning that the objects have accrued. Metaphorically, we may also think of the inferred source of Nicole Jolicoeur's creations, which is Jolicoeur herself, as an archive; in examining that archive, we try to articulate the story Jolicoeur is telling us about herself and about ourselves as women. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,856
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,955

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,039
Tête enseignante GPT0,278
Écart entre enseignants0,239 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMosaic (Winnipeg)Même sujetPhotography and Visual CultureTravaux en français237 207