Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Rod Beaujot, Earning and Caring. Peterborough: Broadview Press, 2000,416 pp. In the social science of the in general and the sociology of the in particular, this text is like dew from above and a fresh breeze arising from the horizon. Beaujot has presented a document of high calibre, articulate language, meticulous mining of data and published works, and an expression of concern for families in Canada. He does this with a careful eye that both transcends and penetrates ideological lenses that so frequently colour Canadian sociology of the family. organization of the text is well structured. author begins with a presentation of his key thesis: The tension between caring and earning provides a useful entry point for a study of contemporary life and policy. Earning and caring are the key activities of families, in effect the very basis for family (p. 24). He then presents, in the following order, chapters on the and work, gender, changing families, paid work and income, unpaid work and the division of productive activities, fertility, children and youth, and policy dimensions. Within this structure, especially noteworthy contributions include: using the central and critical concepts of earning and caring with much finesse; calling forth those who are dissatisfied with the distinction between the private (caring) and the public (earning); the presence of an extensive analysis of the vitality of the role of gender both in families and in the economy; the link between the micro and the macro; a remarkable ability to construct a common, unified story using such a wide variety of sources; and the use of many important and sensitizing concepts such as: strategies, stages of gender equality, the life course, instrumental and expressive functions, life trajectories, and unique and special needs of children. Beaujot is also to be commended to be inclusive in his disciplinary terrains such as: biology, socio-biology, psychology, economics, social demography, sociology and social psychology. He also is not adverse to use several theoretical perspectives to argue for the need to unite earning and caring phenomena in the lives of Canadians. These perspectives include: feminism, political economy, structural functionalism (at least by way of implication) and exchange theory. Further, the author attempts to challenge the myopia of the classical founders of sociology (Marx, Durkheim and Weber) whose foci were on the public and macro dimensions of society. He adds to this list Parsons and Becker. This work is not to concentrate on the to the detriment of the importance of the public but, rather a perspective that unites both the private and the public. He writes: The interplay of earning and caring feeds into a number of important sociological questions. Sociology studies the organization of economic activity and the socialization of children as key considerations in the continuity, change and differentiation of societies. In effect, both economic production and social reproduction are essential to the survival of any society (p. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,073 | 0,045 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».