MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W330502527

The Trotsky: A Claim to Community

2012· article· en· W330502527 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amir Khan

Notice bibliographique

RevueCineaction! · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoliticsPremiseSociologyHistoryLawPolitical scienceEpistemologyPhilosophy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A distinction between an earlier and later Charles Taylor might be drawn between Charles Taylor political activist versus Charles Taylor intellectual. (1) Certainly nature of writing going on in a political tract like The Pattern of Politics (1970) (2) is at removes from intellectual forays into malaise of modernity or crisis of self and identify. I won't attempt to square what an earlier Taylor says with a later Taylor. But Taylor's politics were local enough in 1960s to make a book he wrote during that time pertinent 1o what I want to say about The Trotsky (2009), a film shot entirely in Montreal and engaged in its own way with radical Canadian politics. I am not applying a Taylorian reading to film than suggesting that film itself is a reading of this particular political text of Taylor's--that movie ingests and thereby depicts some of us most pertinent lessons. Even if a later Taylor does not square with an earlier Taylor, what The Trotsky attempts is to make something like politics of polarization matter once again, which is to say it attempts to reclaim some of lessons put forward in The Pattern of Politics. One could also say this film attempts to reclaim dialectic, in particular notion that holds conflict (between clearly opposing viewpoints) as lynchpin of social change. How film reinterprets dialectic will be considered here. The premise of film that a young Montreal teenager, Leon Bronstein (Jay Baruchel), believes himself to be living embodiment of Leon Trotsky reincarnated suggests it is not beyond pale to think about things like having another's soul occupy one's body, and, from there, to consider whether ontology of film facilitates a discussion of reincarnation (another's soul trapped in a body eerily present to us) or rather, something like reverse (a body occupying another's soul). I raise these examples in consideration of ontological differences between what Cavell calls, simply, (stage actor) and (screen actor). What we might nowadays call 1960s (Canadian) counterculture, auteuring a film explicitly aimed at youth of Canada. Whether or not Pierre Trudeau is a galvanizing figure for today's youth or not, those who are curious to know him are likely to know him through Colm Fiore. I don't mean that Fiore's persona trumps Trudeau's. Indeed, Fiore interprets Trudeau way a stage actor interprets a character. But Fiore, in interpreting Trudeau, is interpreting a star, or, say, Trudeau's star-like quality and not a character, To play role of Trudeau, he must get his persona to match Trudeau's. Others may come along, not with different interpretations, but something like better impersonations. (4) Yet for a generation at least (or for a generation of Canadian youth interested in 1960s Canadian counterculture now), simply by having appeared to us as Trudeau on screen, Fiore's persona will invoke or be caught up with Trudeau (though not vice versa). Fiore is, or has achieved, a reincarnation of Trudeau. The [stage] actor's role is his subject (or study, and there is no end to it. But screen performer is essentially not an actor at all: he is subject of study, and a study not his own. (That is what content of a photograph is--its subject.) On a screen study is projected; on a stage actor is projector. An exemplary stage performance is one which, for a time, most fully creates a character. After Paul Scofield's performance in King Lear, we know who King Lear is, we have seen him in flesh. An exemplary screen performance is one in which, at a time, a star is born. After The Maltese Falcon, we know a new star, only distantly a person. means the figure created in a given set of films. His presence in those films is who he is, not merely in sense in which a photograph of an event is that event; but in sense that if those films did not exist, Bogart would not exist, mane would not mean what it does. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,884
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,230

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0380,078
Communication savante0,0140,013
Science ouverte0,0020,012
Intégrité de la recherche0,0090,010
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0190,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,296
Écart entre enseignants0,262 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCineaction!Même sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207