Underachieving in America: Researchers Document International Gaps, a Journalist Seeks the Cause
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Endangering Prosperity, with three distinguished authors and an eminent introducer, is devoted to one major point: United States is truly falling behind not only East Asian countries that for some time have scored best in international comparisons of educational achievement, but also a good part of developed world, including its neighbor, Canada. The book eschews difficult effort of determining just why United States, undoubtedly a leader in educational attainment and possibly educational achievement 40 or 50 years ago, now trails other nations in both. Nor does it discuss what specific measures might enable us to catch up. Rather, through international comparative analysis, volume demonstrates that educational achievement, particularly in mathematics and science, is closely related to and probably a prime mover in economic advancement, leading to conclusion that if we do not improve our educational achievement, our economic predominance is also threatened. The book's distinctive contribution to discussion of comparative educational achievement is its ability to slot various states of United States into charts of international achievement by linking statistically scoring system of National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), which measures achievement by individual state, to that of Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), which tracks achievement around globe. And so we discover that Massachusetts, faring best among American states, stands far up scale, between Switzerland and Japan (but still behind Shanghai, Singapore, Hong Kong, Korea, Finland, and Taiwan); that northeastern and upper midwestern states score at top in United States; and that United States as a whole is way back in rankings, between Portugal and Ireland. Endangering Prosperity is meticulous in considering alternative explanations of differences in economic development. Although volume does not attempt to analyze causes of our relative decline or how it might be overcome, it shows a preference for some explanations and solutions: book asserts, for example, that the school work force--teachers, principals, superintendents, other administrators, and ancillary personnel--too often favor only those changes to status quo that enhance their income and lighten their workload. Simple solutions proposed by vested interests, such as higher expenditures, smaller classes ... added support and administrative personnel will not do. Structural reform is needed: authors are not specific, but their approval of legislative actions to alter teachers' evaluations, teachers' tenure, teachers' layoff rules, bargaining issues, and more, in a range of states, Wisconsin, Indiana, Florida, Oklahoma, Ohio, Colorado gives a strong hint as to what they favor. [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] Does experience of countries that have gone far beyond us in educational achievement support this preference? In The Smartest Kids in World, we have a fascinating book to help us ponder just what has driven educational achievement in countries of East Asia and, surprisingly, Finland, which stands at top in achievement in Europe. It was intriguing idea of Amanda Ripley, an investigative journalist, to track experiences of three American highschool students who, dissatisfied with offerings in their home schools, decided to go abroad for a year and attend school in two countries that surpass us in educational achievement--Korea and Finland--and in Poland, which has shown remarkably rapid improvement in PISA tests. Three more diverse education systems and environments could hardly be imagined, and chances of their teaching same lesson are unlikely. Kim, a teenager in Sallisaw, Oklahoma, high school, tried to fit in as a cheerleader and marching band flutist, failing at both, and by way of unexpected high test scores took advantage of opportunity to go abroad for a year through AFS. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle