Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Walsh, Helen, ed. TOK 5: Writing New Toronto. Toronto: Zephyr Press, 2010. 207 pp. $19.95 sc. TOK 5: Writing New is fifth volume from Zephyr Press's Diaspora Dialogues series. The poems and short fiction in this collection centre on city: though most pieces emphasize character development, volume's focus on urban spaces directs readers to understand as made up of shared places that are experienced in different ways by different individuals and communities. The instruction to reader from editor, Helen Walsh, to a tourist in this known, and yet unknown, Toronto (7), highlights these differing perceptions of city. This imagined reader is already familiar with Toronto: pleasure of reading is seen to come from having known spaces recontextualized, as reader is invited to see through eyes of an imagined Other. The writer is thus positioned as a kind of guide, set up to reveal the truth of ethnic experience to a foreign audience. It is logical, then, that bulk of collection is realist fiction, accessible to a reader who needs to recognize a familiar space in order to understand it also as a new destination. The anthology includes work drawn from Diaspora Dialogues's mentorship program, which means that it contains work by established writers--Emma Donoghue, M. G. Vassanji, Nalo Hopkinson, and Shyam Selvadurai are examples--alongside work by emerging writers. Despite diversity of pieces, some common themes emerge. Many of writers engage with questions of power in both public and private spheres, and many contest ideas of inheritance or family through expressions of anxiety over parenting. The power of racist narratives to limit expressions of personal identity is a repeated motif, and this racism is seen to come from within particular communities as well as to imposed on them from outside. Taken together, these pieces present idea of multicultural city as being made up of a series of spaces that fragment individual identity. For example, in Gaughin's Chair Selvadurai's novella extract, protagonist experiences York University campus as a place of loneliness and anonymity, but it is also a place where he can be gay, pursuing a relationship with his classmate, lames. In contrast, his home is invaded by countless cousins, in front of whom he must remain closeted. Who he is allowed to be, and ways that he can express his identity, are dictated by where in city he is, and there does not seem to anywhere that he can fully himself. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».