MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W334765691

2009 Treasurer's Report

2010· article· en· W334765691 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kathryn Adamson

Notice bibliographique

RevueFontes artis musicae · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueState Capitalism and Financial Governance
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPaymentAuditWork (physics)BusinessEconomicsActuarial scienceFinanceAccountingEngineering
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Income from membership for this year was broadly on target. Payments were received from those national branches which were late with their payments for 2008. I would like to thank all the national treasurers and membership secretaries for their help and efforts during the year. If you think you can see some discrepancies between the membership figures on the audit document when compared with the income received, next time the job of Membership Secretary or Treasurer becomes vacant in your branch, volunteer to do it, and you'll understand just how difficult it is! All branches are invited to be punctual with sending their dues and membership lists in the future, as the budget predictions rely on payments being made on time, and correct addresses mean that extra postage costs are not incurred from re-sending Fontes to new addresses. Membership from non-branch members was down slightly. Dues should be paid by 1st March each year. Miscellaneous income from address label sales was reasonably successful in 2009, but income from advertising has been less than expected mainly owing to non-payment of invoices. I would like to thank David Day for all his work in this area, it is now down to me to chase late payers. Expenditure was less than budgeted. Savings were made in the production of Fontes and in the travel budget. Each year we have set aside around 2.5.% of our income for the Outreach Fund, and in recent times this has equated to 1500 [euro] per year. Although our income this year would appear to produce a figure of around 2000 [euro], we must remember that some of this income actually came from 2008, (late payments of membership dues, Fontes advertising etc.), so I would like to propose that we set aside the usual 1500 [euro]. I am still trying to find a cheap method of enabling payment of membership dues by credit card. This will be my mission for 2010. I don't wish to incur any extra bank charges, especially in a time when we are not making much income in interest payments. We have to set the dues for 2012, while acknowledging that many countries are suffering financial hardship, we have to maintain a reasonable level of capital and the Board therefore suggests that the institutional dues rise to 64 [euro](from 62 [euro]), and individuals rise to 38 [euro] (from 37 [euro]). This will result in an overall increase in this part of our income of around 3%. The Board would also like to propose that IAML adopts the same procedure as IFLA to encourage membership from disadvantaged countries. This would involve reducing the membership fee for countries which appear under a certain level on the Unesco scale of assessment of least developed countries. If adopted this would result in a reduction of 600 [euro] on current membership levels, but it has the potential to encourage new memberships. We are grateful to the 2009 auditors, Pamela Thompson and Richard Chesser. Kathryn Adamson, treasurer June 2010 ACCOUNTS 2009 A. RECEIPTS [euro] [pounds Institu- Personal sterling] tional 1) NATIONAL BRANCHES Australia 2390.39 31 42 Austria 967.20 21 1 Canada 2248.80 31 26 Croatia (2008 & 2009) 654.84 8 0 Czech Republic 569.69 11 0 Denmark 2239.60 31 30 Estonia (2008 & 2009) 1442.40 12 3 Finland 2719.60 51 11 France 2900.00 46 24 Germany 9066.80 163 62 Hungary 642.00 13 1 Italy (2008 & 2009) 10233. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,207
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,199
Écart entre enseignants0,189 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFontes artis musicaeMême sujetState Capitalism and Financial GovernanceTravaux en français237 207