MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W337273074

Student Services: A Student's Eye View

2006· article· en· W337273074 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Angela Runnals

Notice bibliographique

RevueCollege and university · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCharterCertificateHigher educationCompetition (biology)SociologyPolitical sciencePsychologyMedical educationManagementLawMedicine
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, British Columbia (BC), celebrated its fortieth anniversary in 2005. A relatively new university, it has nevertheless seen tremendous changes over the past four decades. As admissions officers, registrars and other student services professionals know, the rate of change is continuing to increase dramatically. But, fortunately, the focus is returning to the student; it wasn't always clear that was the case. Let's look at what the world of admissions officers and registrars has looked like from the point of view of a Simon Fraser University (SFU) student who started school in 1965, 1975, and so on. The Sixties Jane applied to SFU in the spring of 1965 and was accepted for the fall semester. As the University opened its doors for the first time in September 1965, she was deemed a Charter Student and received a commemorative certificate. Although Jane didn't think much about it, it was a tremendous feat for SFU to admit and enroll 2,500 undergraduates in 1965. A January 1963 report to the BC Minister of Education recommended the creation of a new provincial university. A chancellor was appointed in May 1963, and the firm of Erickson and Massey won the campus design competition. Construction began in spring 1964 and the University's physical structure was essentially completed in the summer of 1965. It was built to allow for a future enrollment of 18,000 students. The new university was designed academically to complement the other universities in the province without unnecessary duplication of programming. It was planned to operate all year round, using a trimester system with intake possible in September, January, or May. ADMISSION As a grade 12 graduate of the BC secondary school system, Jane needed an average of 60 percent for basic regular admission. The admission requirements were comparatively simple and consequently easy to understand! She was required to submit two passport-type photographs with her application form. Upon acceptance, she had to have a medical examination and provide evidence of smallpox immunization before completing registration. Those of Jane's friends who didn't qualify for regular admission could apply under the Special Entry category. They had to submit references, write entrance exams, and appear before the Admissions Committee. REGISTRATION What were Jane's program choices as an undergraduate 40 years ago? She could choose from 27 100- and 200-level courses in the Faculty of Arts, 17 courses in the Faculty of Science, and two courses in the Faculty of Education. How did she register? With keypunched cards, of course (remember those?). She lined up at a table to get her registration cards from staff and lined up again at the cashier's office to pay. She paid a total of CAN $214 for tuition for the semester, plus a $5 student activity fee. Certified check, bank, or postal money orders were acceptable forms of payment. As a young woman active in the Girl Guide movement, Jane obtained a scholarship of $100 from the Vancouver Girl Guides Council. With the scholarship, she accepted her stated moral obligation to maintain her ties with the Guide movement. A TIME OF CHANCE As a female student in 1965, Jane did not worry too much about the fact that documents like the University Academic Calendar/Catalog used the third person masculine to refer to students. And she did not worry too much about gender imbalances in programs. She was a good, practical student who handed in her assignments on time, progressed through her program, and graduated with a respectable B.A. in English. However, over the course of her studies she became rapidly aware of social changes going on both inside and outside of the University. Eight years after graduating, she came back for a couple of years as a Special Student, to take women's studies courses in the new program administered by the Women's Studies Coordinating Committee. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,830
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,338

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0200,007
Communication savante0,0150,010
Science ouverte0,0020,009
Intégrité de la recherche0,0150,022
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0410,011

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,214
Écart entre enseignants0,209 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCollege and universityMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207