MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W337472349

Frederic W. Root's "Systemizing Voice Culture"

2009· article· en· W337472349 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephen F. Austin

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Singing · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueDiverse Musicological Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWonderRoot (linguistics)SingingMusicalVisitor patternPsychologySociologyHistoryVisual artsPedagogyArtLinguisticsManagementComputer sciencePhilosophySocial psychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I AM GRATEFUL TO David Grogan for providing me with the following article that appeared in Musical Visitor, a magazine of music literature and music published in the United States from 1883 to 1897. David is a DMA candidate at University of North Texas and is completing his thesis on the life and teaching of American educator Frederic W. Root. Regular readers of this column might remember an earlier article by Root called The Voice Teacher's Problems.1 Root was a well known voice teacher in this country as well as a very prolific author and regular guest lecturer. following is a lecture that he presented at a meeting of the Canadian Society of Professional Musicians, December 31, 1890. My purpose of presenting these comments is as an introduction to the principles of pedagogy as he expressed in his popular method books, including School of Singing (1873), Root's New Course in Voice Culture and Singing (1891), and the monumental Technic and Art of Singing (1901) that was published in eight volumes. It makes sense to follow the address offered below with his solution to what he perceived to be a common problem: the absence of a consistent method that is universally trusted and taught. While some of his remarks might be considered a bit inflammatory, I believe that it is a good thing to consider how far we have come in the last one hundred years. Systemizing Voice Culture Frederic W. Root I wonder if teachers generally ever stop to consider how poorly our science compares with others in the matter of Pedagogics; how imperfectly its professors have as yet approached the standard of the professors of other branches of instruction, as regards analysis, scientific statement, careful gradation and systematic instruction. Do we ever reflect that, while a parent wishing to have his child taught science, literature or languages, can find on all sides schools in which he justly has perfect confidence, if he wishes to have him taught Voice Culture, and is highly ambitious as to the result, he searches long and anxiously for some teacher or institution, where he may experience a comfortable certainty as to the result?-a certainty not so much that the finest educational work will be done, as that the voice shall not be ruined and the mind filled with affectation and nonsense. Our public schools afford an example of what scientific pedagogy may be. Notice the accuracy of statements made in their textbooks; observe the copiousness of illustration of every point, and the well-considered gradations of all difficulties; observe how foundations are laid first, and how, as the subject is developed, one step prepares for another in logical sequence. Notice the methods by which the pupils are examined at intervals to ascertain if every step has been correctly taken; and lastly, appreciate the fact that graduation from one of our higher educational institutions, which carry the public school course to conclusions, means real mastery of certain subjects of study. As further proof that education in such lines of study is broadly established upon a sound pedagogic basis, and is scientifically administered through civilized countries, we perceive that graduates of reputable institutions everywhere compare similarly; that they are similarly equipped, and are not in serious conflict as to definitions and results. We shall find each to revere his Alma Mater, and all to respect each other's attainment. Indeed, the same thing is true of music-study in all its departments except Voice Culture. It is possible that some would claim that such was the case with Voice Culture as well; that its principles are established, and generally understood. You might say that a singer's education is well and thoroughly provided for in such important and sufficient considerations as placing or locating the tone in the head rather than in the throat; changing registers at proper places so that there shall be no forcing of the voice; breathing abdominally, and hence deeply and effectively; purifying vowel sounds, articulating forcibly and elegantly, executing clearly and rapidly, etc. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,030
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,059

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,009
Communication savante0,0050,007
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,069
Tête enseignante GPT0,237
Écart entre enseignants0,168 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of SingingMême sujetDiverse Musicological StudiesTravaux en français237 207