MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W33925755 · doi:10.3390/membranes11050320

Engaging Community: Notes on the Necessity of Reflection

2005· article· en· W33925755 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Stovall

Notice bibliographique

Revuethe Journal of Thought · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueReflective Practices in Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesHrvatska Zaklada za Znanost
Mots-clésSociologyCognitive dissonancePedagogyIdeologyNarrativeReflection (computer programming)EpistemologyPsychologyMathematics educationSocial psychologyPoliticsComputer sciencePolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

As we are constantly reminded of the contested spaces in education, reflection on our practice becomes critical to the improvement of learning spaces. Where the following example does not speak to an instance in the traditional classroom, it is equally important due to its attempt to address the educational needs of young people. Utilizing Dewey's (1) five phases of reflective thought, the remainder of this account documents the struggles of a university professor, two college administrators and a group of college students to authentically engage community concerns (issues external to the campus, but centered in the concerns of neighborhood residents) through a process centered in the educational needs of young people. Couched in a narrative, the remainder of the document reflects on the author's role as participant observer in a student designed community initiative. Providing a tangible example of how reflection operates in community spaces, our experiences in a community program shed light on the utility of reflection in the attempt to maintain a program despite escalating conflict. Overview of Deweyan Reflection Popularized in his volume How We Think, Dewey maintains reflection occurs when teachers experience difficult situations in practice and are charged with thinking through them. (2) Taking his suggestion further, the work of Christensen et al, speak to the difficulties in such work. Referring to reflective practice as a conceptual orientation, they feel that it involves: A way to think about dissonance and to examine observations, problems, conflicts, philosophies, belief systems, and ideologies. As an active means of thoughtful consideration, reflection is a persistent search for explanations and alternatives in an attempt to resolve perplexity within an experience. (3) In observing our philosophies, belief systems and ideologies, we come to grips with the motivations, struggles and confirmations that foster engaged learning. For the purposes of this account, the reflection by the group discussed throughout the document speaks to Dewey's assertion that will always be the two sides: the conditions to be accounted for, dealt with, and the ideas that are plans for dealing with them or are suppositions for interpreting and explaining the phenomena. (4) For our experience, the process of engaging young people in an urban community enabled us to come to grips with the difficulties of our outsider status. Despite the fact that many of the facilitators of the project were from the community where the initiative took place, we still occupied an outsider status due to the fact that we now were connected to an institution (university) with a history of hostility toward community residents. The experience called for us to look deeper within ourselves, while engaging young people and the community at large. As conflict was not always visibly present, the narrative reveals how the inability to recognize such tensions can lead to unexpected results. Where the following example for this document is couched in a narrative, our goal was not to engage in a critical reflection of our work. Instead, our reflection came about as part of an attempt to wrestle with conflicting ideologies. As there were no sessions with the college students that actually reviewed Dewey's five aspects of reflective thought, our collective reflections speak to suggestion (where the mind leaps first to a solution), intellectualization (asking a question that demands an answer), hypothesis (to initiate and guide observation), reasoning (the elaboration of an idea) and testing the hypothesis (practice). (5) Our process would be considered idiosyncratic in that we did not follow Dewey's suggested chronology, but each aspect was realized throughout our experience as facilitators in a community program. Engaging Deweyan Phases Currently I am employed as an assistant professor at an urban research institution in a metropolitan area. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,056
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,081
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,056
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,297

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0560,081
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0150,059
Communication savante0,0180,022
Science ouverte0,0050,031
Intégrité de la recherche0,0120,033
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0120,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,105
Tête enseignante GPT0,439
Écart entre enseignants0,333 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuethe Journal of ThoughtMême sujetReflective Practices in EducationTravaux en français237 207