MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W339318393

Keynote Address: Sociology and Organized Labor: Helping to Salvage a Vital Institution

2010· article· en· W339318393 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Arthur B. Shostak

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueContemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésInstitutionState (computer science)Value (mathematics)Labor historyConvictionSociologyLawPolitical scienceLabor relations
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Pennsylvania sociologists operate against a special backdrop. Our state is unique in its place in labor history. Philadelphia vies with New York City for the title of Site of the Oldest Labor Union in Pre-American History even as the western part of the state is the focus of some of the consequential labor-based class warfare in of American history. Given this start Pennsylvania sociologists have good reason to ally with modern local unions in an unending joint effort to help our neighbors achieve lives close to their hearts' desire. Having myself spent over 40 very satisfying years as a labor-focused applied sociologist, I would like to recommend other Pennsylvania sociologists soon try their hand at six related roles. I plan to comment briefly on each role - in alphabetical order - as each is valuable in its own way. I have learned much from taking each of them - and possibly thereby made a contribution to both the discipline I am proud to be part of and the labor movement I am proud to assist. Coursing through of this will be my conviction that organized labor - here in Pennsylvania in particular and elsewhere throughout the nation and world - needs the help it can get, especially that possible from sociologists like ourselves. I take this position conscious of the disparity between it and the profession's politically correct preference for value-neutral social science (or any other science, for that matter). I believe an open declaration of one's bias is far more honest, and, thereby, much more preferable than the deceptive and costly myth of value neutrality. Six Roles as an Applied Sociologist and Union Supporter While there are many more than six ways for Pennsylvania sociologists to help one another, six stand out: 1. Advocate. To begin with, we can help labor by championing certain ideas unionists might not otherwise wrestle with. Unlike some applied sociologists who shy away from taking the position of advocate believing it the prerogative only of the client, I champion a lot of options in my consulting work, and I urge them where appropriate on my union clients. Some of these reforms are far less controversial than others. Typical is my urging clients to survey the ideas of the membership whenever possible, a method that can help explain decisions taken thereafter by union power-holders. I operate here from a foundation of respect for the rank-and-file, and find (though not all) union leaders willing go along. Other positions I advocate are far more contentious, such as favoring the (far too rare) unionization of the field staff of a union. The opposition inside labor argues this will tie the hands of the leader and force the retention of poor performers. Two arguments, I remind them, we hear commonly from rabidly anti-union employers. I also recommend benign quotas to speed the advancement as staffers of talented women and people of color. And I champion more mediation and less militancy whenever a company seems trustworthy (a far too rare occurrence). Most recently I am busy advocating a fresh approach to Informatics, the heart of the computerization process, which I regard as the single greatest opportunity for union renewal to come along in decades. A powerful mixture of telecommunications advances (fiber optics, satellite waves, etc.) and information technology (the Internet, the World Wide Web, etc.), informatics is making possible the most extensive communications system on earth. (Ogden; 17). Organized Labor thereby confronts a New Economy - one all about ... the ability to transform [organizations] into new entities that yesterday couldn't be imagined and that the day after tomorrow may be obsolete. (Tapscott; 43) As an applied sociologist I have studied labor's computerization process in considerable detail, both here and overseas (Canada, England, Israel, Norway, and Sweden). I have interviewed scores of pioneer users, observed many applications, assessed results, and especially sought out visionaries (in and outside of Labor) with blue sky ideas about possibilities. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,898
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,345
Écart entre enseignants0,312 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetContemporary Sociological Theory and PracticeTravaux en français237 207