MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W340124464

Public Health Information, Federalism, and Politics

2007· article· en· W340124464 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueDigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiquePublic Health Policies and Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoliticsFederalismPublic healthGovernment (linguistics)Public administrationPolitical scienceLawMedicine
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Although an element of healthy tension is inevitable in Ontario's relations with the federal government, there is no room during a health crisis to indulge in this ritualistic intergovernmental bickering. (1) Canada's efforts at battling SARS have been viewed as nothing short of heroic on the international front. One of the areas in which we performed less than optimally, however, was that of information handling. Intergovernmental tensions were displayed to problematic effect, and may have led to the World Health Organization advisory warning against travel to the Toronto region. In this paper, I briefly examine the legal and political landscape for information sharing for public health purposes, and offer some suggestions for moving forward in this area. Public Health Infrastructure David Naylor, the Chair of the National Advisory Committee on SARS and Public Health, has described the public health infrastructure in Canada as follows: What exist now are separate systems within each of the provinces and territories, as well as a federal system that operates primarily at Canada's international borders. (2) One of the major factors contributing to these separate systems is the constitutional division of powers, to be discussed in the next section. It is also the case that public health inevitably commences at the municipal level. Local/regional public health units are the point of contact for primary care givers and their patients. Municipalities in turn report to the provincial and not the federal government. This was all the more so historically, as is reflected in comments of the Royal Commission on Dominion-Provincial Relations (the Rowell-Sirois Commission) in 1938: In 1867 the administration of public health was still in a very primitive stage, the assumption being that health was a private matter and state assistance to improve or protect the health of the citizen was highly exceptional and tolerable only in emergencies such as epidemics, or for purposes of ensuring elementary sanitation in urban communities. Such public health activities as the state did undertake were almost wholly a function of local and municipal governments. (3) While we have seen much change since 1867, it remains the case that hospitals, regional health units, and local care facilities are the on-the-ground loci for public health, and where the lion's share of public health information is generated. Legislation and Constitutional Division of Powers Canada is a federal state in which jurisdiction over the areas of information and of public health is shared between the federal and provincial/territorial governments. Neither public health nor information is addressed in the Constitution Act, 1867, so we must look to a number of areas of allocation of to arrive at an overview of the constitutional landscape. Health has been identified by Estey J. of the Supreme Court of Canada as an amorphous topic, which can be addressed by valid federal or provincial legislation, depending in the circumstances of each case on the nature or scope of the health problem in question. (4) The federal government has been granted jurisdiction over quarantine and marine hospitals (5); census and statistics (6); trade and commerce (7); peace, order, and good government (8); criminal law (9); Indians, and lands reserved for the Indians (10); and matters not exclusively assigned to the provinces. (11) Also, although not explicitly stated in the Constitution Act, 1867, the federal government is widely assumed by constitutional experts to have a great deal of latitude to spend funds as they wish (12); indeed, the Canada Health Act was enacted under the power of the purse. Provincial governments have jurisdiction over hospitals other than marine hospitals (13); property and civil rights (14); municipal affairs (15); and matters of a local or private nature. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,491
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,000
Communication savante0,0000,007
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,047
Tête enseignante GPT0,313
Écart entre enseignants0,266 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle