MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W340341918

An Ideal Solution: Sculptural Politics, Canada's Vimy Memorial, and the Rhetoric of Nationalism

2010· article· en· W340341918 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dennis Duffy

Notice bibliographique

RevueMosaic (Winnipeg) · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNationalismAestheticsPoliticsRhetoricAsideContemplationRhetorical questionSociologyIdeal (ethics)LawIdealismHistoryPhilosophyLiteraturePolitical scienceArtEpistemologyTheology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Walter Allward's Vimy memorial marks moment in the development of Canadian nationalism when the losses of World War I reinforced what had already become an established tradition in our cultural discourse: the definition of the nation in terms of idealized abstraction. The sacred space defined by the memorial suited the aims of both artist and public, who preferred an eclectic mixture of traditional motifs to modernist meditation on the fact of mass death. [The Vimy monument] is in fact the most pretentious war memorial in the world. The situation is saved by it being an expression of Canada's idealism. --Mackenzie King, Diaries, 11 October 1936. This essay originates in one of criticism's primal acts: an inability to reconcile what I was looking at--in this case, Canada's Vimy memorial to its World War I dead--with what authorities had seen there. Consider, for example, the response of Lane Borstad, whose command of the facts and scope of sculptor Walter S. Allward's career is unmatched. Borstad sets aside the historical and empirical grounding for his authority and recommends instead an approach brushing away any hint of the contemplative: Because the figures speak directly to the emotions rather than act strictly as religious symbols, they are accessible to those who bring to the memorial their own experience of sorrow, loss, and hope (Borstad 36). Can we experience any cultural object without engaging the sum of our life experiences? To use personal example, my experiences as palliative caregiver have surely reshaped my response to the emotionality of Robert Motherwell's Elegy for the Spanish Republic series of paintings. But that response--like the target of bolt of lightning during storm--requires no particular kind of object as its destination. Any ground will do. If monument is in some way mnemonic, but serving no function more complex than that of locus for emotional release, then will not any mnemonic do? A string around the finger, rubber band around the wrist, knot in handkerchief: what does it matter, so long as we remember the errand the reminder signifies? Jacqueline Hucker, chief historian of the memorial's restoration, knows at first hand great deal about the monument. Yet her assertion of its modernist style appears curious in its omissions. If the memorial displays a strong, architectural structure that was stripped of all decoration and relied for effect on simple lines and weighty, formal abstraction (Hucker 43), then what are we to do with the twenty larger-than-life, allegorical figures that crowd the structure? Can we block all this statuary from view? Can we behold two monuments, one before our eyes, the other, kind of invisible ur-monument stripped of the allegorical figures that are in fact among its most prominent features? How could I reconcile what Hucker had designated with what towered before me? My own reading of the memorial's genesis and history compels my dissent from these authoritative accounts of the nature and meaning of Canada's memorial at Vimy. Surveying the idealistic drift of the verbal national cultural discourse within which this sculptural object took its place at the time of its inception and completion underlines the eclectic, neo-classical, late-Victorianism of its gestural vocabulary. Whatever stance the podium for the idealized and gigantesque (twice life-size) figures may have assumed, the fact remains that the memorial as whole is allegorical and consolatory in intention and figuration. Devoid of irony, it stands at the opposite of any modernist sculptural statement. Nothing should surprise us in the memorial's anti-modernism, since the sculpture enacts kind of idealized national image-making implicit within the wider habit of Canadian nationalist discourse at the time, discourse that the artist's government patrons sought to augment. The Vimy memorial's power over its original audience depended upon its relation to the emerging nation's ongoing conversation about its identity. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,899
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,965

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,233
Écart entre enseignants0,226 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMosaic (Winnipeg)Même sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207