Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract / Resume What are the functions and meanings of oral versus written texts for Indigenous peoples? In this document, I consider how oral and written texts have possibly contributed to the construction of society[ies] and to the foundational differences between Indigenous and non-Indigenous societies. I then consider the systematic shifts in norms overtime, arguing that oral societies developed as consensus-based societies, functioning with internal accord. Finally, I consider the question: how can we, as Indigenous peoples, continue to transfer accord accurately with our meaning of truth, by which I mean our ontology, epistemology, values, and world views? Quels sont les fonctions et le sens de la tradition orale et des ecrits pour les peuples autochtones? L'article examine comment la tradition orale et les ecrits ont pu contribuer a bâtir les societes et a etablir des differences generales entre les societes autochtones et non autochtones. On examine ensuite les deplacements systematiques des normes avec le temps en mettant de l'avant que les societes de tradition orale se sont developpees comme des societes fondees sur le consensus et l'accord commun de leurs membres. Finalement, on pose la question suivante : comment pouvons-nous, a titre de peuples autochtones, continuer de transferer la notion d'accord avec notre definition de la verite, c'est-a-dire notre ontologie, notre epistemologie, nos valeurs et nos visions du monde? Introduction In this paper, I attempt to understand human communication systems, in particular, the functions of, and differences between, oral communication and written text communication. To do this, I first briefly outline what I mean by communication and language for both humans and other animals, following which I explore the functions of oral and written text communication and try to come to some reasonable understandings of the meanings of oral and written text communication. By exploring the functions and meaning of oral and written text, I next consider how these have possibly contributed to the construction of societypes] and to the foundational differences between societies that are based on oral texts and those based on written texts. These attempts lead me to try to understand the systematic shifts in norms which play themselves out through the hegemony of one truth, in this case globalization and a capitalist mentality. I argue that oral societies develop as consensus-based societies, functioning with internal accord. Finally, I consider the question: how can we, as Indigenous peoples, continue to transfer accord accurately with our meaning of truth (e.g., ontology, epistemology, value, and world view)? A Story It must have been September or October, 1996. My daughter was just a baby in a front pack, and we were walking at the Rieffel Wildfowl Refuge in Richmond, B.C. During our tour, the guide stopped and showed us two fields filled with white Snow Geese. As he explained, the geese filled both fields, one inside and one outside the refuge. But, he explained, on the day hunting season opened, every year, at the exact hour hunting season began, all of the geese would move to the field inside the refuge. The Snow Geese had learned to read human behavior. They had also developed intra-species orality that would allow them to move as one, in consensus. When survival is at stake, a specific function of orality (what I will explain as accord) is of paramount importance. Communication and Language We use language to communicate on a daily basis. Our languages are often taken to be like the air that we breathe-something taken for granted, normally invisible (unless there is something peculiar), and effortless-therefore, we do not even think twice about the function and meaning of language itself: What is language? What is communication? Who communicates? Are humans the only communicative animals? Are communication systems restricted to live beings? …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle