MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W340473716

Any Rx for the NIM Squeeze? (Special Report)

2002· article· en· W340473716 sur OpenAlex
Steve Cocheo

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueABA banking journal · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueBanking stability, regulation, efficiency
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLoanChorusInterest rateAsset (computer security)Net interest marginQuarter (Canadian coin)CollateralEconomicsBusinessEconomic historyFinanceHistoryArt
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A decade ago, when Home Savings Bank introduced interest-rate caps and floors to many of its borrowers, Howard Boyle's top concern was that the bank might be losing upside potential for the seemingly secondary advantage of being able to limit how far a floating-rate loan's rate could drop. We were actually more concerned about seeing market rates go in the other direction-up, says Boyle, president and CEO of the $99 million-asset institution, based in Kent, Ohio. At the time, rates were in the range of 9%10%, but Boyle remembered the 1980s, when business and mortgage loan rates in the mid-to-high teens were common. Who would have thought that prime would be as low as it is today? asks Boyle. Despite Boyle's early worries, Home's now longstanding cap-and-floor policy has stood the course well, especially under recent conditions, helping to preserve the bank's net interest margin at a time when many other community banking institutions are feeling the effects of net interest margin compression. search of solutions without dangers Shrinking NIMs have been plaguing community banks for some time, with the chorus of pain reaching its highest pitch this fall and into the winter. We knew we were asset-sensitive, but it really came home to us when the Fed dropped rates in the first says David Gohn, chairman and CEO, West Plains Bank and Trust Co. Our first quarter was the worst first quarter in 15 years. Since then, the $164.9 million-assets Missouri bank has been fighting back, particularly by readjusting rates on interest-bearing transaction accounts. After dipping to a margin of 3.71%, the bank is back up to 3.87%. It's almost enough to make some older bankers teary-eyed for the days of Regulation Q and usury laws, when much of banking was robotic, with NIMs virtually legislated in. Days that are long, long gone. the third quarter, the average margin for banks with less than $100 million in assets remained unchanged from second-quarter levels at 4.26%-although that level was the result of four successive quarterly drops, according to FDIC's latest Quarterly Banking Profile. Compare this to 4.59% in the third quarter of 2000 for the same banks and you get the idea of the squeeze. In the current rate environment, they are going to have to grin and bear some of the shrinkage, warns David Burns, Philadelphia-based partner in the financial services institution practice of Grant Thornton, the accounting firm. Burns says one of the greatest risks banks face in the current period is trying to make up for shrinking NIMs by over-reaching on the credit side of the balance sheet. We've been talking with community bankers, consultants, and accountants around the country to assemble a cross-section of potential remedies your bank can try. There are no magic bullets, says Daniel Trigg. In fact, banks should not overreact to what's been happening in the marketplace, because it's probably an anomaly, says Trigg, who is national financial institution practice director, RSM McGladrey Inc., Bloomington, Minn. / Caps, floors, and prepayment penalties Rate floors, aside from swaps and other moves that are not too popular among community banks, are probably the closest things to a pure solution. Floors-with penalties-go right to the heart. So it's not surprising some bankers who hear about caps and floors stifle a snort. Never sell that in my market, they scoff. Others say it alienates good accounts - and their friends. So how do bankers who say they have successfully worked caps and floors into their loan documents manage the feat? Success hinges on willingness to make the case to prospective borrowers, they say, and to lose the occasional loan to competitors. It all depends on how well your bank deals with its clients and how well it serves their needs, explains Clarence Jones, president and COO, Farmers & Merchants State Bank, Boise, Idaho. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,492
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,239
Écart entre enseignants0,201 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle