Reflections on Emil L. Fackenheim Z"l (1916-2003): The Man and His Holocaust Philosophy
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Professor Emil Ludwig Fackenheim, the eminent German-born Jewish philosopher of the Shoah, died in Jerusalem on 22 Elul 5763 (19 September 2003). Though his roots are with the great German-Jewish thinkers such as Moses Mendelssohn, Hermann Cohen, and Walter Benjamin, and his religio-philosophical faith with Franz Rosenzweig, Leo Baeck and Martin Buber, his fate as a refugee Jewish philosopher and writer is more akin to Hannah Arendt and Ernst Bloch, who described man as on a voyage of discovery, borne by the desire to reach his homeland (Das Prinzip Hoffnung, 1954-59). Imprisoned at Sachsenhausen concentration camp in 1938, Fackenheim emigrated to Canada in 1940,(1) then to Israel in 1984. Educated in Jewish thought at the Hocschule fur die Wissenschaft des Judentums in Berlin (founded by famed Reformer Abraham Geiger in the nineteenth century), and in philosophy at the University of Halle and University of Aberdeen, he read widely in a wide range of sources, including, Bible and Rabbinic writing, Greek classics, and German idealism. His early writings and interest reflect an awareness of medieval Arabic scholasticism and medieval Jewish philosophy as well as studies on Schelling, Kant, and Hegel. But it is his insistence on the importance of Shoah for Jewish theology, his love for the Jewish People, and his commitment to its survival with dignity and without apologetics, which have consumed his thoughts since Sachsenhausen, that have rendered him the consummate Jewish philosopher-theologian of the Shoah. The sub-units in this section are constructed as mini-essays to explain the contribution and significance of the work of Emil L. Fackenheim to Shoah Studies. They reflect issues and interpretation from and about his scholarly contribution. Haas suggests that the corpus of Fackenheim's writing reflects a mind that tried to bring the verities and truths of the old world into the post-Shoah post-Modern-world. Garber discusses aspects of Fackenheim's Judaism after Shoah. Morgan writes on the main features of Fackenheim's encounter with the Nazi horrors and addresses three fallacies about his Shoah thinking. Littell focuses on the importance of Fackenheim's dialectical philosophy for the Christian world. Rubenstein shares agreement and disagreement with the thought of Fackenheim on the Jewish religious situation in the aftermath of the Shoah. Patterson evaluates the life of Fackenheim as a Jew, a philosopher, and a Jewish philosopher. It is our hope that these essays, written by internationally respected scholars in the field of Shoah Studies, serve as a fitting tribute to a giant in our discipline, Emil L. Fackenheim. Yechi Zichrono Li-Vracha. Emil Fackenheim: To Mend Two Worlds Peter J. Haas Emil Fackenheim's life was lived in two worlds. His early years were spent in one homeland, that of pre-War Germany; his death took place in his other homeland, Israel. His training was in the great thinkers of the Enlightenment, while as a philosopher he had to straggle with the post-Modern collapse of Enlightenment optimism. His education was in one of the great institutions of the German-Jewish synthesis, the Hochschule fur die Wissenschaft des Judenthums; his academic career was built in the secular, North American University of Toronto. In between these two worlds was the yawning gap of the Shoah. In his life and his work, Fackenheim straggled to bridge these worlds and make sense of each in terms of the other. In this struggle, Fackenheim, as a witness and a thinker, articulated the problem of what it means to be a Jew after the Shoah. In so doing he attempted to bridge several sets of worlds and helped define the agenda for future thought on the subject. As Emil Fackenheim himself noted, Jewish philosophical thinking intersected fruitfully with the larger world of Western philosophy in only two cultural contexts. One was the Greco-Roman tradition, beginning with Philo and carrying through the great neo-Aristotelian traditions of Maimonides and the Maimonideans. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle