Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Where's George? (2005) Whereas George? (2005) Directed and produced by Peter Davis Villon Films www.villonfilms.com 69 minutes. Veteran documentary filmmaker Peter Davis, whose award-winning sociopolitical films have been featured on nearly every major global television network, turns his lens on the Vietnam War era with the film Where 's George? (2005). The footage for the film was shot in 1969 but edited in 2005, and it is apparent that Davis sees parallels between the Vietnam conflict and current American military operations in Iraq. Where's George focuses upon the story of soldier George Caputo who deserts from the military and seeks refuge at St. Paul's Chapel on the campus of Columbia University. Students gather to support and protect George, but when he disappears after three days, the community engages in an acrimonious debate over how to help George. The soldier is often ignored in the ensuing discussions which often focus upon George as a symbol in political discourse rather than as a flesh and blood person. For example, we learn little about George's life and background. Davis does not provide viewers with a narrator guiding our voyage through these seemingly endless and repetitive debates. We are allowed to reach our own conclusions as Davis employs the cinema verite of a Frederick Wiseman. The grainy black and white footage primarily focuses upon the intense faces of the young people, none of whom are identified, providing a sense of claustrophobia and limited options. As the debate drones on, the camera shifts its lens from speakers to authence members whose eyes almost appear to glaze over from the barrage of words. And it is interesting to note that most of those willing to take up the microphone are white males. Some speakers provi de a class analysis of the situation, asserting that supporting draft resistance would allow for a bridge to be constructed between working class youth and privileged students with college deferments. Others find this perspective to be too theoretical, arguing that how to best serve the individual deserting the military should be the primary mission. The suggestions range from smuggling the refugees to Canada via a modern underground railroad to providing attorneys and sympathetic media coverage for their plight. The return of George alters the debate. He is frustrated by the seemingly endless discourse, proclaiming that he has no intention of going to Canada and that if the authorities attempt to seize him the only alternative will be to kick ass. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,015 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».