MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W343410740 · doi:10.1353/srm.2012.0036

Strange Truths in Undiscovered Lands: Shelley’s Poetic Development and Romantic Geography by Nahoko Miyamoto Alvey

2012· article· en· W343410740 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nicholas Birns

Notice bibliographique

RevueStudies in Romanticism · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueTravel Writing and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoetryRomanceSkepticismFantasyRomanticismLiteratureIdeologyArt historyCriticismArtPhilosophyHistoryLawTheology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

296 BOOK REVIEWS strength ofthe volume as a whole. It takes him into little charted territories ofmusical and literary production ofthe eighteenth-century and Romantic periods, which end up redrawing the cultural maps we thought we had by heart. In this important enterprise, Brown is a seriously entertaining and lucid guide. What with its promiscuous love for music, poetry, art and phi­ losophy; its skepticism toward ideology and the orotundities of the sub­ lime; and corresponding fondness for the unregarded domains of fantasy and anacreontic stylings, I was put in mind of another gifted, pleasureloving skeptic whose name is never mentioned in the book. Leigh Hunt would have loved The Tooth That Nibbles at the Soul. Indeed, with more serious musical training, and a little time travel, he might have written it. Gillen D’Arcy Wood University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Nahoko Miyamoto Alvey. Strange Truths in Undiscovered Lands: Shelley’s Poetic Development and Romantic Geography. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009. Pp. 224. $55.00. Alvey’s book is the latest in a series of explorations of Shelley and the East, which has included important contributions from Frederic Colwell, Nigel Leask, and Benjamin Colbert. The book comprises five chapters, covering “Queen Mab,” “Alastor,” “Mont Banc,” Prometheus Unbound, and “The Witch ofAtlas.” Alvey’s predominant concern is to examine themes of im­ perialism, cross-cultural curiosity, and representation of the other, an em­ phasis that has been a productive vein in Shelley criticism for over twenty years. Alvey’s book seals and to some extent concludes this sequence of scholarship. Alvey’s introduction traces the genesis and orientation of the abovementioned sequence. She then begins her argument proper with a chapter on “Queen Mab,” where her intent is to show how versatile Shelley’s rhetoric of otherness is, incorporating both the near but marginal (Wales and other portions of the “Celtic fringe”) with the far and even mythical (the Americans and Atlantis). Atlantis, as a place of mystery and storied an­ tiquity, shares an “obscurity and remoteness from contemporary Europe” (36) with the East, and it is in this spirit that Alvey suggests that Mayan and Aztec ruins are referenced in “Queen Mab.” In a mythopoeic sense, Atlantis—as Alvey demonstrates in her second chapter, on “Alastor,”— foregrounds perhaps the central conceptual innovation in her book. This is the importance to Shelley of a certain doubling of the referent of the Cau­ casus, to cover both the Caucasus on the east side of the Black Sea as well SiR, 51 (Summer 2012) BOOK REVIEWS 297 as “the Indian Caucasus,” the mountains of Kashmir or, more generally, the “Hindoo-Kho” (ill) or modern-day Hindu Kush. This “ambiguity” was vital for Shelley, and the valence of the doubling is obvious. In IndoEuropean terms, it naturalizes India to the West in much the same way as Sir William Jones’s discovery ofthe shared linguistic aspects ofSanskrit and European tongues. In racial terms, it takes the Caucasus—the locus classicus, after all, of what had already been “the Caucasian”—whiteness—with the non-white east. Thus both the origins of Europe and its salient others are to be found secreted in a mysterious mountain ambit. Alvey does some very precise geographical reading here, but while some of her insights are cogent, others are more hit-or-miss. Her engagement with this splendidly forlorn, Miltonic passage is exemplary: He wandered on Till vast Aornos seen from Petra’s steep Hung o’er the low horizon like a cloud; Through Balk, and where the desolated tombs Of Parthian kings scatter to every wind Their wasting dust . . . It is notable how “the lone Chorasmian shore,” which the first-time reader of the poem no doubt just jots down as a bit of obscure detail, be­ comes one of the poem’s aural signposts to the veteran reader. Alvey rightly sees “Petra” as not the most apparent referent, the city of red rocks in present-day Jordan, but the Rock of Sogdiana in what is now eastern Iran; Aryan in other words, not Arab. While she exerts a more impressive command of the welter of historical data than some of her predecessors, these crypto-Persian references are...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,023

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,010
Communication savante0,0060,005
Science ouverte0,0000,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,048
Tête enseignante GPT0,280
Écart entre enseignants0,232 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueStudies in RomanticismMême sujetTravel Writing and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207