Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Slow Reading by John Miedema. Duluth, MN: Litwin Books, 2009. 92pp. ISBN 978-0-9802004-4-7. Fast! The speed of life seems to rule our world today. Fast food, fast cars, fast connections, instant communication, instant gratification…time races forward, technology races forward, and we race to keep up. Social commentators, psychologists, and educators decry the cost of the sped-up world on our abilities to focus and perform tasks that require time and concentration. Nicholas Carr (2008) describes his own experiences in his article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”: I’m not thinking the way I used to think. I can feel it most strongly when I’m reading. Immersing myself in a book or lengthy article used to be easy…That’s rarely the case anymore. Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages. I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do. I feel as if I’m always dragging my wayward brain back to the text. The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle. Several movements are now questioning the wisdom of life in a constant fast lane, proposing alternatives that bring satisfaction at a slower pace. Groups advocating slow food, slow travel, slow parenting, slow sex, slow art, and other slow movement activities champion the benefits of more deliberation and reflection in our everyday lives. In his book Slow Reading, author John Miedema presents the title concept as a spectrum of voluntary actions that readers of all levels and tastes can use to increase their pleasure and comprehension, while examining its development and numerous facets. Slow Reading contains only sixty-five pages of text, but it is packed with discussions and references that support the author’s goal of providing “a first, full sketch of the breadth of the subject of slow reading, encouraging further research in the area, and inspiring readers to take up slow reading for pleasure” (p. 5). The detailed index affords quick access to specific points in the discussions, and an eleven page bibliography provides an exhaustive list for further investigation into the topic and its related fields. Miedema began researching the concept of slow reading while a student in the Library and Information Science program at the University of Western Ontario, and this book developed out of his master’s thesis. The discussions in each chapter are brief, but offer plenty of food for thought for educators, librarians, pedagogical researchers, and others interested in the impact of technology on the act and future of reading. The five chapters of the book consist of four essays exploring the topic from different perspectives and disciplines and a summary of ideas for the implementation of slow reading. Miedema emphasizes that “Slow reading is not about reading as slow as possible at all times, but rather exercising the right to
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».