MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W343959264

"Now I See It for What It Really Is": The Impact of Participation in an Innocence Project Practicum on Criminology Students

2012· article· en· W343959264 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rosemary Ricciardelli, James G. Bell, Kimberley A. Clow

Notice bibliographique

RevueAlbany law review · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLegal Education and Practice Innovations
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésInnocencePracticumPsychologyConvictionCriminal justiceFeelingImprisonmentCriminologyCourseworkSocial psychologyLawPedagogyPolitical sciencePsychoanalysis
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Despite the growing number of university and law school-based innocence projects in North America, the impact of participation in the case review process on students has been underexplored. The current study investigated the experiences of criminology students who participated in an innocence project practicum at a Canadian university. Overall, participants found the practicum to be a positive experience that led to greater empowerment and increased feelings of competence and self-worth. Additionally, the innocence practicum impacted students' views of wrongful conviction and their beliefs about the criminal justice system. In particular, students left the practicum with a better appreciation of the factors that contribute to wrongful conviction, knowledge that wrongful convictions occur more frequently than they previously thought, feelings of empathy about the post-release challenges faced by exonerees, and the sense that they could make a difference in the lives of others. Moreover, students developed more negative views of, and lost faith in, the criminal justice system as a result of their involvement in the practicum. The implications of these findings are discussed. I. INTRODUCTION Research has found that many exonerees exhibit psychological symptoms similar to those of survivors of sustained catastrophes, such as victims of abuse and war veterans. (1) For example, Dr. Adrian Grounds conducted extensive assessments of eighteen men who had been erroneously convicted and incarcerated and found that wrongful imprisonment may lead to personality change, posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and panic disorder. (2) Studies based on interviews with exonerees reveal that many exonerees experience feelings of profound grief and loss as a result of their wrongful imprisonment. (3) Christopher Ochoa, for example, described the void left by his wrongful conviction when he said: I have no family, I have no kids, I have no education, no car, no house. I used to get the newspaper from back home. I used to see these people that I went to school with. They had kids, beautiful homes, beautiful wives, and all this stuff, and I had nothing.... (4) Although freedom is initially a time of joy and celebration for the wrongly convicted, this joy often gradually subsides as exonerees experience the realities of life after exoneration. (5) Like other ex-prisoners, exonerees face numerous challenges following their release, including locating housing and employment. (6) However, because they are usually released with little notice, preparation, or support, they are often left to confront these challenges on their own. (7) For example, because they are innocent of the crimes for which they were incarcerated, exonerees are generally not eligible to receive the reintegration counseling, housing assistance, and employment training provided to other ex-prisoners. (8) Exonerees must also cope with social stigma and hostility, which is often fuelled by prosecutors and police, who-despite evidence proving otherwise--maintain that they are guilty. (9) Thus, after years of living in maximum security prisons for crimes they did not commit, exonerees are often re-victimized by those responsible for their wrongful conviction in the first place and left to fend for themselves. (10) As John Wilson remarked: If you're a victim of war, if you're a victim of a disaster, there are all kinds of organizations that will help you. But if you're a victim of our system of justice and you lose your freedom and you're traumatized in a similar manner [as a war veteran or a refugee or a person who's a victim of a disaster or a terrorist act], we don't have any mechanisms to help you get back into a normal life and a normal place in society. (11) To date, over 280 American citizens have been exonerated through the use of post-conviction DNA testing. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,014
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,054

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,022
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0140,008
Communication savante0,0090,002
Science ouverte0,0030,010
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,317
Tête enseignante GPT0,580
Écart entre enseignants0,263 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations6
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAlbany law reviewMême sujetLegal Education and Practice InnovationsTravaux en français237 207