MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W344012631

Bridging the Gap between Classrooms and Research Laboratories: One Teacher's RET Experience Working in a Mycology Lab

2007· article· en· W344012631 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Science Teacher · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueAnimal and Plant Science Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésStipendCurriculumScience educationSociologyPedagogyMedical educationEngineering ethicsMathematics educationPolitical scienceEngineeringPsychologyMedicine
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In the ever-expanding realm of science, educators struggle to share new discoveries and techniques with their students. Keeping abreast of recent advances can be daunting, even for the most motivated teacher. Fortunately, the National Science Foundation's (NSF) Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) program helps educators keep up with the fast-moving research community. The RET program enables K-12 science teachers to perform research projects in NSF-supported laboratories and brings the excitement of cutting-edge science into the classroom. In this article, I describe my RET-supported experiences working in a laboratory that studies the ecology and evolutionary biology of fungi, and I provide advice on how teachers may find RET opportunities in their own communities. RET awards are made as supplements to ongoing NSF research grants, which are conducted under the direction of Principal Investigators (PI), who are typically faculty members at universities. The PI of an active award may request an RET supplement, which can pay for the K-12 teacher's stipend, research supplies, and other expenses, such as travel to a scientific meeting or costs associated with curriculum development. My RET project was conducted under the direction of David Hibbett, a faculty member at Clark University in Worcester, Massachusetts, and Manfred Binder, a research fellow in Hibbett's laboratory. Hibbett and Binder are Co-PIs on a current NSF grant to study the evolutionary relationships of the Boletales, a group of mushrooms. With support from an RET supplement to Hibbett and Binder's NSF grant, I performed research at Clark University for eight weeks during the summer of 2006 and attended the annual meeting of the Mycological Society of America in Quebec City, Canada. What led to my RET project The path to my 2006 RET project actually began back in 2003, when I participated in a mycology workshop led by Hibbett at Clark University. The workshop was funded as part of another NSF grant, Assembling the Fungal Tree of Life, on which Hibbett was the PI. Thinking I would learn about traditional taxonomy--the branch of science that seeks to sort species into ordered groups based on morphology and anatomy--I was surprised to find that Hibbett's lab resembled a high-tech biotechnology facility. Researchers in his lab are using the latest tools in molecular biology and bioinformatics to probe the cryptic world of fungal classification and evolution. Ecology, molecular biology, and evolution--topics that can seem unconnected in the minds of most high school students--are being interwoven into a dynamic new science. After taking the mycology workshop, I became active in the Massachusetts Association of Biology Teachers (MABT), a regional branch of the National Association of Biology Teachers (NABT). Through this network I reestablished contact with Hibbett and learned that he and Binder were looking for a teacher to collaborate with, through their Boletales grant. The collaboration they proposed involved development of a learning module for high school students in fungal molecular ecology (in which DNA sequences are used to identify fungi in the environment). I eagerly agreed, hoping I could learn more about mycology and ways to involve my students in a research-based curriculum. Hibbett came to my school in the fall of 2005 and together we led classes in basic fungal biology, molecular ecology, and evolution. The experience was positive. Students learned about an ecologically important group of organisms and the connections between molecular biology and organismal biology, but I was not completely satisfied. One problem was that students did not actually generate the DNA sequences that they analyzed. Instead, these were provided by Hibbett's laboratory as text files. In addition, I was uncomfortable with my understanding of the details of the research. The solution, I realized, was for me to gain firsthand research experience, which would allow me to design more engaging classes for my high school students. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,021
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,177
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0210,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,004
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,200
Tête enseignante GPT0,438
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle