MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W344446041

Eskimo Drawings/Upside Down: Seasons among the Nunamiut

2006· article· en· W344446041 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
John B. Wolford

Notice bibliographique

RevueWestern Folklore · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPeninsulaHistoryAnthropologyArt historyVisual artsArchaeologyArtSociology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Eskimo Drawings. Edited by Suzi Jones. (Anchorage: Anchorage Museum of History and Art, 2004. Pp. 208, foreword, acknowledgments, introduction, photographs, illustrations, map, notes, bibliography, index. $24.95 paper) ; Upside Down: Seasons among the Nunamiut. By Margaret B. Blackman. (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2004. Pp. xii + 206, acknowledgments, introduction, photographs, illustration, maps, notes. $27.95 cloth) Together, these books provide insights into the personal and cultural lives of some of the peoples of Alaska, but they certainly go about it in different ways. Obviously, Eskimo Drawings focuses on the visual products that certain Native artists have produced, and perhaps less obviously, Upside Down focuses as much on the anthropologist who finds herself doing work among the Nunamiut (inland Eskimo) as it does on the Nunamiut themselves. From these quite different approaches, however, the reader gains insights into the interior life of these particular Eskimos. Eskimo Drawings accompanies an exhibit by the Anchorage Museum of History and Art, which concluded in September 2003. The first exhibit to focus on the museum's extensive collection of Eskimo art, it focused on the lives and cultures of specific artists from the Seward Peninsula area (Inupiat) the Yukon delta area (Yupiit) and the Bering Sea islands (Siberian Yupiit). The drawings represent a historic range from the late 1800s to the late 1900s, with only one woman featured among the men in this male-dominant profession. Some of the artists came to this work because of injuries that prevented them from carrying out their expected roles as hunters; some others, the earlier ones, were encouraged by missionaries and other whites to produce this art; while Napaaq, the lone woman artist, seems to have begun as a way of helping an archaeologist-bureaucrat (Otto Geist) gather information about Yup'ik culture and society, as much for the personal relationship she had with him as for the payment. The articles in the catalog are interesting because of their variety, which Suzi Jones, the editor, created by mixing up scholarly works with personal reminiscences by the artists' relatives or friends, including one piece by a white artist-gallery owner. The scholarly pieces are an interesting mix of an art-historical focus on formal analysis with a heightened sensibility toward personal, cultural, and social influences and effects of the art; and the personal pieces flesh out the influence of the artists on their families and communities. The drawings are fascinating not only for their styles and historic development, but for their common interest in detailed, esoterically ethnographic representation of Eskimo folklife, appearance, domestic life, occupational customs, and landscape. The artists broadly were in concert in their desire to maintain their traditions through graphic representation, even though-and this is a fascinating point-they drew for the tourist trade and other outsiders. Connected to this point is that typically the artists included written narratives, either inscribed on the graphic piece itself or attached to it, that explained the scene in terms of customary life. A central, or at the least, a contributing motive for the drawing for all of these artists was to pass on cultural information. Milo Minock would not only draw scenes, but would draw details of material items (e.g., bone lamps, stone lamp, clay lamp, sealskin bag for oil) underneath or on the side of the picture to show the details, almost like pages from a Yup'ik version of Popular Mechanics , as contributor Steve Henrikson notes (176). This need to narratize customary life in a personal way to an outside audience-whether that audience is the Native group which is today culturally distant from the originating artist's culture, or whether it is a non-Native audience that never had a connection to the Native tradition-is perhaps what most connects Eskimo Drawings to Upside Down. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,890
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,275

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0820,017

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,323
Écart entre enseignants0,305 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueWestern FolkloreMême sujetIndigenous Studies and EcologyTravaux en français237 207