Alberta's Future Leaders Program: A Case Study of Aboriginal Youth and Community Development
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract / Resume In this paper, Alberta's Future Leaders Program is used as a case study to identify and evaluate the implementation, or lack thereof, of and community development Aboriginal contexts. Promising practices and potential program changes are also explored. As such we move beyond examination of the links between and community development and focus on how culturally appropriate programming can serve to benefit Aboriginal and community programs ways that allow Aboriginal to become more connected to themselves, their communities, and their cultures. L'article presente une etude du cas de l'Alberta's Future Leaders Program pour cerner et evaluer la mise en oeuvre, ou son absence, du developpement communautaire et du developpement des jeunes dans des contextes autochtones. On explore aussi les pratiques prometteuses et les modifications potentielles du programme. On depasse ensuite l'examen des liens entre la jeunesse et le developpement communautaire pour se concentrer sur les avantages que les programmes sensibles a la culture peuvent apporter aux programmes communautaires et pour les jeunes d'une maniere qui permet aux jeunes autochtones de mieux se connaitre et de se lier a leurs collectivites et leurs cultures respectives. Recreation programs for have become a popular way of 'developing' as well as the which they live. These programs are offered an attempt to engage and healthy lifestyles and to enable them to reap the benefits of participation leisure, recreation, and sport. With an abundance of programs and anecdotal evidence of their success comes the need to assess whether or not these programs are fact successful and, if so, what factors lead to their success. If common threads between successful and community programs can be identified, then criteria for development programs can be used to enhance and strengthen existing programs. In this paper, we use Johnston-Nicholson, Collins, and Holmer's (2004) framework of the Six Cs to examine Alberta's Future Leaders Program (AFL), while also drawing on broader literature pertaining to and mentoring. The AFL links development with community development an attempt to strengthen the ties between the predominantly Aboriginal with which the program works and the which they live. The AFL Program will be used as a case study to identify promising practices and community development an Aboriginal context. Further, we evaluate the implementation, or lack thereof, of these practice within the AFL, and potential program changes are explored. Introduction In the past, development and community development initiatives were often conducted independently of each other. However, according to London, Zimmerman, and Erbstein (2003), the failure to link and community development results youth development [that] are stunted their abilities to cultivate people's individual growth, their membership communities, and their ability to effect institutional and community and leads to young people's alienation and resentment of the implied low expectations and the cultural and political disconnect from their communities (p. 34). Community development can be defined as a process intending to educate and involve citizens a process of individual empowerment and community (Hutchinson & Nogradi, 1996:93), while, similarly, development involves positive change on an individual basis and/or on a societal basis (Baldwin, 2000). Certainly, linking programming and community development is important because each one can enrich the other. London et al. state that when thought of, and practiced together, youth, organizational, and community development can exponentially improve all community efforts (5). The authors also find that in partnership, these models of development can create ladders of responsibility and support that draw into progressively higher levels of organizational and community leadership (35). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle