MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W349056238

Dr. Nancy Morrison and her dying patient: a case of medical necessity.

2002· article· en· W349056238 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Barney Sneiderman, Raymond Deutscher

Notice bibliographique

RevuePubMed · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueHealthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Manitoba
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAppealJuryLawCoronerConvictSupreme courtPrologueQueen (butterfly)MedicinePolitical scienceMedical emergencyHistoryPoison controlSuicide prevention
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

1. Prologue On May 6, 1997, 60 police officers swarmed into the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre (QEII) in Halifax, Nova Scotia, in order to effect the arrest of physician, Dr. Nancy Morrison, on charge of first-degree murder in connection with the death of patient six months earlier. They also carried out searches of 21 locations pursuant to search warrant. The patient had died in the intensive care unit (ICU) two and half hours after his removal from artificial life support, and months later physician at the hospital had informed the police that Dr. Morrison had unlawfully caused his death. A preliminary inquiry was held in Provincial Court where Randall P.C.J. discharged Dr. Morrison after ruling that a Jury properly instructed could not convict the accused of the offence charged, any included offence, or any other offence. (1) When the Crown's appeal was denied by Supreme Court judge, (2) it decided to pursue the matter no further. The case of R. v. Morrison thus never went to trial. This article has dual purpose: to present and analyze the legal repercussions of the patient's death, and then to consider the viability of defence of medical necessity if the case had gone to trial. On the day of his death the patient received massive infusions of drugs, and the precise dosages and times of administration will be duly noted. (3) A brief review of the drugs in question will assist the lay reader to appreciate the situation as it unfolded. All told, between 6:50 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. on his last day the patient received intravenously four drugs to ease his dying: Ativan, Versed, morphine, and Dilaudid. (4) Ativan (generic name lorazepam) and Versed (generic name midazolam) are sedative-hypnotic and anti-anxiety drugs. He received 10 mg of Ativan which is not an unusual amount. However, the amount of Versed was in excess of 230 rug, whereas the recommended common of Versed for the intractable distress of dying patient is 30-60 mg/24 hours. Hence the total given (mostly between 12:30 p.m. and 2:30 p.m.) was four times the highest daily dose recommended for such cases. Morphine is an opiate analgesic (in lay terms, pain-killer), whereas Dilaudid is synthetic opiate and is five to eight times more potent than morphine. The patient received 40 rug of morphine and in excess of 800 mg of Dilaudid. In effect, then, this amounted to somewhat more than 4400-6800 rug of morphine equivalents. To place this drug history in context, consider study appearing in the journal, Palliative Medicine, which reviewed 30 cases in which morphine was administered to relieve the intractable distress of dying patients. The dose range over 24 hours was between 150-600 mg for 18 patients, 600-2500 mg for nine patients, 2500-5000 rug for one patient, and in excess of 5000 mg for two patients. (5) In other words, Mr. Mills was given more opiates than 90 per cent of these patients and comparable amounts to the other 10 per cent. Beyond that, the time frame for all 30 patients was 24 hours whereas his was only seven hours and 40 minutes. A case reported in the journal, Clinical Pharmacy, provides the drug history of terminally ill cancer patient who required exceptionally high doses of narcotic analgesics to control chronic, severe pain. (6) Over the last few days of her life, her daily intravenous (IV) intake of morphine was in the range of 8100-8500 mg. (7) Again, note that in less than eight hours Mr. Mills received in excess of 4400-6800 rug of morphine equivalents. In sum, one can say that Mr. Mills received what was clearly an extraordinary (although not unheard of) amount of opiates. 2. The Day of the Patient's Death Paul Mills was 65 years old and he was very sick man; on November 9, 1996 his caregivers and family agreed that the time had come for him to die. His medical history was as follows. Mr. Mills was admitted to the Moncton (New Brunswick) General Hospital in April 1996 with cancer of the esophagus. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,983
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,851

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,070
Tête enseignante GPT0,345
Écart entre enseignants0,276 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeAutre devis
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2002
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePubMedMême sujetHealthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsTravaux en français237 207