MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W349146857

A Thematic Bibliography and Literature Review of Rural, Remote and Northern Women's Health in Canada 2003-2006

2007· article· en· W349146857 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Rebecca Sutherns, Maureen McCallum, Margaret Haworth-Brockman

Notice bibliographique

RevueResources for feminist research · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRuralitySociologyRural areaHealth policyExcellenceSocial determinants of healthHealth careSocial scienceGender studiesPolitical scienceGerontologyMedicineLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction While it has long been acknowledged that health is determined by a variety of social and physical factors, research into the interplay among these various determinants of health is still emerging. From 2001 to 2003, the Centres of Excellence for Women's Health examined the impacts of gender and rurality, two important and often neglected determinants, on women's health in Canada in order to generate an agenda for policy making and further research. As part of that national study, Rebecca Sutherns, Pamela Wakewich, Barbara Parker and Christine Dallaire conducted a review of the literature entitled, Rural, Remote and Northern Women's Health in Canada: A Literature Review and Thematic Bibliography. (2) They noted that although Canadian research on rural, remote and northern women's health was limited at the time, momentum was clearly building. This paper has been written as a follow-up to that review. It examines the Canadian literature on rural, remote and northern women's health published from January 2003 to June 2006. Using the same search strategy, format and analytical categories of the earlier piece, it offers an analysis of how the literature has evolved. Following a brief introduction to women's health in Canada, it presents the current research according to thematic categories. It then explores the scope, sufficiency, accessibility and methodology of that body of literature, reflecting on its strengths, gaps and tensions. It demonstrates that while some areas of women's health research continue to thrive, the overall level of activity in recent years has been disappointing. The research strategy used in this project was the same to that used in the 2003 study. As before, the search endeavoured to find material both in peer-reviewed journals as well as through community resources, both in English and in French. The search included material which includes health, and rural both explicitly and implicitly. However, some databases and web sites were no longer accessible. (3) Refereed academic journals accounted for 68 percent of the entries found. Notable sources for non-academic publications include Prairie Women's Health Centre of Excellence, the Centres of Excellence for Women's Health collectively and Pauktuutit Inuit Women's Association, each of which contributed to the advancement of knowledge of women's health. Articles in this search were reviewed to determine their suitability in the database and were subsequently filed according to their theme. Although themes were matched to those identified in the previous research project, several new themes were established from the current search. Duplication was avoided by selecting the most appropriate category for each article. Rural Women's Health in Canada In this section, we provide a brief synopsis of women's health in Canada, to provide some context against which the results of this review can be understood. Roughly 20 percent of Canadians live in towns of under 10,000 people, which is Statistics Canada's definition of a place. This proportion varies widely by province and territory, ranging from 15 percent in British Columbia and Ontario to 68 percent in Nunavut. Close to 99 percent of Canada's ten million square kilometres are by area (Statistics Canada, (4) Society of Rural Physicians o[ Canada (5)). Though the specific implications of living in rural, remote or northern locations vary widely, there is no doubt that rurality acts as a determinant of health in people's lives. It influences their physical environment, level of isolation, access to health care services and health status, as well as the attention paid to them by policy makers (Sutherns, 2005). Although research specifically addressing the lives of women is quite limited, there is significant evidence to suggest that women's roles, health experiences, health status and health choices are heavily circumscribed by their gender and their location. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesBibliométrie
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,936
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,949

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,018
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0640,161
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0100,004
Communication savante0,0080,003
Science ouverte0,0030,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,414
Écart entre enseignants0,376 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeRevue systématique
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2007
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueResources for feminist researchMême sujetIndigenous Studies and EcologyTravaux en français237 207