Longing for God: Anglicans Talk about Revelation, Nature, Culture, and Authority
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Longing for God: Anglicans Talk about Revelation, Nature, Culture, and Authority. By the Primate s Theological Commission, Anglican Church of Canada. Toronto: ABC Publishing, 2001. 108 pp. CDN $18.95 (paper). There are many intelligent and committed Christians who are theology, but I have often observed that they are doing so without (a) knowing that they are doing it (or admitting to it) or (b) knowing how to identify the limits or consequences of their particular theology, and hence, having the opportunity to challenge those limits. The purpose of the series Wrestling with God is to encourage Anglicans to participate in serious thought and generous discussion (p. 5) around issues facing the church today-issues that are made complex by religious and spiritual pluralism, secularism, ecumenism, and other challenges. This is not a how-to book that sets out a methodology of thought, but rather a workbook that and then invites readers to do the same. It is an invitation to theological exploration that leads by example. The committee responsible for writing and compiling this series is made up of Anglicans from various cultural, ethnic, and theological backgrounds, and includes Aboriginal representation. To date there have been two books published in the series; this review will deal with Book One, Longingfor God: Anglicans Talk about Revelation, Nature, Culture, and Authority. Longing for God is very simple to follow and use. It is divided into three sections: the first lays out the intention of the book as simply to engage in a theological discussion, coupled with an invitation to participate, and a list of resources. In the foreword, Michael Peers, primate of Canada, asks, What does do for us? (p. 6). He finds his answer in Genesis 32:22-32, the story of the night that Jacob wrestled with God. Peers invites the reader to consider that one way to understand this story is to recognize that Jacob is doing theology. The result is that we discover that theology opens wounds (Jacob is injured in this wrestling match), and it holds enormous potential for healing (Jacob's refusal to give up results in a blessing). Theology tells us who we are . . . [and] we are transformed (p. 6). The beauty of Peers's own wrestling with this story is that it highlights the fact that what might seem to be a very reasonable application of the story to many Anglicans may well raise the hackles of other, more literal, readers of the Bible. And when we know this, there is an irresistible challenge laid out before us to find out why-and in the struggle that ensues, relationships of trust are born that allow us to question our systems and attitudes of belief in a new way. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle