An evaluation on the outcomes of the Sekolah Rakan Alam Sekitar(SERASI) programme in Sabah, Malaysia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This study evaluated the implementation of SERASI Programme in Sabah in terms of attitude change and outcomes. Evaluation of attitude change focused on three attitude components namely cognitive, affective and behavioural. Intended and unintended outcomes of the programme were also evaluated. The evaluation showed that the implementation of SERASI in the 39 schools had enhanced and improved environmental attitude amongst teachers and students. Collective change of attitude among the teachers and students may have resulted in behaviours that in turn produced positive environmental outcomes. Based on the teachers’ years of service, it was found that there was a significant difference in environmental attitude after SERASI implementation. It was also found that there was no significant difference in environmental attitude between teachers who attended environmental education courses and those who did not. The results showed there was no significant difference in environmental attitude between teachers who teach environment-related subjects and non-environment related subjects, between graduate and non-graduate teachers, and between primary and secondary school teachers. For students, it was found that there was a significant difference in environmental attitude between leaders and non-leaders, and between primary and secondary school students. The results showed that there was a positive correlation between teachers’ understanding on SERASI and their environmental attitude. Positive correlations were found among the cognitive, affective and behavioural components of teachers’ and students’ environmental attitudes. Based on the results, 88.5% of teachers and 90.3% of students responded that their schools’ surroundings were more pleasant and cleaner after SERASI was implemented. Therefore, this particular outcome was the most obvious outcome of SERASI in the 39 schools. These findings were concluded by both qualitative and quantitative data analyses. There were other intended and unintended outcomes found in the research. For future research pertaining to the evaluation of SERASI Programme, studies should include more districts and schools, and other aspects of SERASI. The research findings are important to the organisers of SERASI Programme and to other relevant organisations working closely in the field of environmental education in Sabah.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».