MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W360905454

The Future of Corporate Sustainability Reporting: A Rapidly Growing Assurance Opportunity

2006· article· en· W360905454 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of accountancy online/Journal of accountancy · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueRisk Management in Financial Firms
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAccountingSustainability reportingBusinessAuditCorporate social responsibilitySustainabilityExecutive summaryInternal auditGoing concernPublic relationsFinanceAuditor's reportPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY * To satisfy the information needs of external and internal stakeholders, more organizations are measuring and reporting on their social and environmental performance. CPAs can play an important role in providing the needed information and helping verify its accuracy. * Corporate sustainability reporting (CSR) involves reporting financial and nonfinancial information key stakeholders on the company's operational, social and environmental activities and its ability deal with related risks. * The most dominant CSR regulations are those of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), which issued its first comprehensive reporting guidelines in 2002 and its G3 Reporting Framework in October 2006. As of October 2006, more than 1,000 international companies had registered with the GRI and issued corporate sustainability reports using its standards. * An opportunity exists for CPAs audit the information companies present in corporate sustainability reports. As of yet interested parties have not fully agreed on what information can and should be audited. Concern exists about the suitability of the criteria used prepare the reports and what performance and reporting standards the auditor should use. * A joint task force of the AICPA and the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) concluded the 2002 GRI standards had not yet reached a point where they were suitable criteria be considered generally acceptable and allow a set of generally accepted assurance standards for CSR reports be developed. Two exposure drafts offered by accountants in the Netherlands on assurance engagements related sustainability reporting are currently under review by international accounting organizations including the AICPA. ********** Faced with increased pressure from internal and external stakeholders, more organizations are measuring and reporting on their social and environmental performance as well as the usual financial reporting measures. Stakeholders have been pressing companies publicly report this information either in annual financial reports shareholders or in voluntary corporate performance reports. The worldwide growth of socially responsible investment funds, investment rating systems such as the Dow Jones Sustainability Index and investment policy disclosure requirements also have put financial pressures on companies make these kinds of nonfinancial disclosures. As this trend grows, so, too, will the role of accountants and auditors. CPAs within organizations will play a key role by providing and measuring the social and environmental information, using their skills improve its quality and facilitate its use make sound business decisions in areas such as investment appraisal, budgeting and strategic planning. Auditors also will have a significant role in verifying the accuracy of the reported information as well as the systems and practices from which it is derived. This article provides all CPAs with an overview of corporate sustainability reporting and the role it may play in businesses worldwide. BEYOND THE BOTTOM LINE Organizations have come realize that meeting stakeholder expectations is as necessary a condition for sustainability as the need achieve overall strategic business objectives. While maximizing shareholder value continues be an overriding concern, companies will not be able do that over the long term if they don't meet other key stakeholder interests. According a PricewaterhouseCoopers report, The Value Reporting Revolution: Moving Beyond the Earnings Game, to create long-term economic value for society--shareholders and other stakeholders alike--sustainability says that companies must also create social and environmental value. To create transparent reports that provide accurate and reliable data, as well as a fair picture of overall performance, many companies are now reporting results across the triple bottom line of economic, environmental and social performance. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,279
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,009
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,261
Écart entre enseignants0,239 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle