Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Doug Wilson. Bird: Life and Legacy of Mark Fidrych. New York: Thomas Dunne Books, 2013. 306 pp. Cloth, $29.99. Those who observed Mark Fidrych's amazing year of 1976 will never see its like again. Those who did not can be forgiven if they believe the rest of us exaggerate. At the beginning of the movie Gandhi, the narrator says something like, In the future, people will have difficulty believing that such as man existed. Thanks to Doug Wilson, they will believe in The Bird. This kid pitcher from rural Massachusetts barely made an impact on scouts, yet improved steadily until he reached the starting rotation of the woebegone Detroit Tigers. He became not only the best pitcher in baseball, but among the most famous and most beloved men in America. That's the story any baseball fan who observed it knows and remembers. It's all here, including insightful reasons why the times were right for The Bird to fly from local hero to national phenomenon. Wilson doesn't just tell the story that everyone saw. He also tells the inside baseball story of this once marvelous pitcher's rise and fall. Unlike many baseball writers, Wilson has a working knowledge of how the game is played. He researches like a scholar and writes like a journalist. He charts, with compassion and acuity, the sad path from Fidrych's wonder year to his professional demise at age twenty-eight. After 1976, The Bird won exactly ten major-league games. Fortunately, Wilson was able to interview Ralph Houk, the Tigers' manager in 1976, months before he died at age 90 in 2010. With vivid memory and profound understanding, Houk shares why he believes Fidrych was so successful and also speculates on why he got hurt. Many fans and historians blame Houk for over-working a twenty-one-year-old arm that threw dozens of elbow-bending sliders to the tune of 250 innings and twenty-four complete games. Houk himself believed the answer was more complex and finally, probably, unknowable. Wilson pinpoints the exact pitch after which Fidyrich's arm went dead, never to return. Yes, it followed all those complete games, but it also followed a knee injury sustained the following year. Pitching a baseball is stressful and complex. Why successful pitchers fail is equally so. No matter how much or how little one knows about pitching, one will learn something from the way this book unpacks the mystery of Fidrych's arm. Yet the book's value is not merely that it captures The Bird, either the media sensation, the national craze, or the All-Star pitcher. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,015 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle