Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In The Deptford Trilogy Robertson Davies defines his versions of a Canadian myth.Essentially the trilogy tells and retells the tale of the quest for self-fulfilment.At first Dunstan Ramsay is firmly established as the authoritative narrator in Fifth Business, and his account of Boyd Staunton's personal history is the first full version of the myth.Then, the tale is retold in the stories of David, Liesl and Magnus.When Ramsay self-reflectively closes the trilogy, his own quest ends successfully in artistic immortality.Throughout. the minor characters in their roles as doubles reflect aspects of their more fully developed central counterparts.At the same time, Judeo-Christian and classic mythoi along with Jungian models of psychoanalysis accumulate to substantiate the various tales.As the work gradually unfolds, a superbly crafted entry into the Canadian conscience emerges.In the end we are given Davies' analysis of the nation's mind through his myth.The Deptford Trilogy brings together fiction, history and mythology.One must acknowledge that gothic (Suggars 2012), autobiographic (Braz 2009), and traditionally mythic (Grant 2009, Ryan 2011), are all valid views that are not necessarily competing but complimentary.(See Gamlin, 1992 for a more a thorough discussion of myth.)In Fifth Business, Ramsay, the hagiographer, self-reflectively announces -141-Robertson Davies' Deptford Trilogy as Canadian Myth that he is about to write The Saints: A Study in History and Popular Mythology (185).In The Manticore David mentions that Ramsay is currently working on "something about faith as it relates to myth" (353).Finally, in World of Wonders Ramsay declares outright that he is recording Magnus' experience to gain immortality:I deeply wanted to create, or record, and leave behind me a document, so that whenever its subject was dealt with in future, the notation 'Ramsay says .. : would have to appear.Thus, so far as this world is concerned, I should not wholly die.(569)The fiction before us is therefore mostly secular hagiography with an emphasis on the mythical element.According to Magnus, Ramsay's fictionalizing of those around him "is truer to the essence of [his] life than the dowdy facts could ever be" (528).Similarly, David agrees when Ramsay says, "history and myth are two aspects of a kind of grand pattern in human destiny: history is the mass of observable or recorded fact, but myth is the abstract or essence of it" (377).Ingestree later points out that "we cannot help falsifying [the past] in terms of later knowledge" (606).Lind then adds that art through the creation of myth can capture the subjective truth of the past: "[W]e would produce an Abdullah that would give the right effect.though it might be far, far away from the real Abdullah of 1918" (607).Thus, the trilogy sets out to create a web of myths comparable, perhaps, to Ramsay's Hundred Saints for Travellers.(See, for comparison, Grant 1995).Essentially, the myth of self-fulfillment is retold in variations, often with Jungian applications but always within the Canadian context.Ramsay himself acknowledges that most tales can be reduced to a few core myths.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,013 | 0,039 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,007 | 0,014 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,029 | 0,018 |
| Communication savante | 0,027 | 0,016 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,009 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,007 | 0,010 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,052 | 0,009 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».