Fully engaged : a senior performer on the Fringe theatre circuit
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This project studies the Canadian Fringe theatre circuit through an analysis of my wife, Susan Freedman's, experience of writing, producing, and performing her first show, "Fifty Seven and Still Lying about My Weight."In so doing, the project aims both to offer a descriptive and analytical account of the basic structural requirements involved in mounting and touring a successful Fringe show, and to assess what role, if any, age plays in such a process.In the first chapter, I examine in detail Susan's creative construction of her successful 1999 Vancouver Fringe Festival show, which was autobiographical and clearly broadcast her senior viewpoint in its title.The second chapter outlines the adjustmentsboth performative and personalthat Susan and I, as stage manager, had to make in taking the show on the road to five different festivals across Canada and the United States in 2000.Finally, the third chapter asks if Susan's life experience, and that of other senior participants, was important in creating their Fringe shows and affiliations.I interviewed fifteen seniors to obtain their Fringe stories.The results of these interviews, when analyzed alongside Susan's experiences on the Fringe circuit, elicit important age-related information.For example, the number of seniors attending the festivals as volunteers and audience members is growing.Older audiences are attracted to, and support, senior performers.Also, Susan and other senior performers feel greatly empowered by the freedom and success of their performances.~mportantly, the Fringe welcomes older performers at a time when established theatres no longer employ them because of their age.Their Fringe shows are motivated more by pure enjoyment and less by career ambition than those of younger artists.Older actors incorporate the benefits of their life experiences into their performances, which in turn often helps facilitate mentoring of younger colleagues.In short, just as seniors' good health can benefit from participation in the Fringe phenomenon, so is that participation integral to the continued good health of the Fringe itself. People InterviewedIn order to determine if Susan's experiences on the Fringe circuit were comparable with those of others, I interviewed a number of people about their Fringe affiliations.Twelve of the interviewees were Fringe performers, four of whom, like Susan, fell into the category of solo women performers during their Fringe careers: Mary Fulham, 50, had performed previously as a stand-up comic; in 2003, as a writer, director, and performer, she brought her play to Montreal and acted in it with other cast members.Christine Ueguello, 55, the Executive Director of the San Francisco Fringe festival, was performing her first solo show in 2003, touring in Canada and Scotland.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,027 | 0,009 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».